US counties by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 3144 counties in 2024, at 97,385. Natrona County had the lowest, at -20. The median was 42 and the figure for the United States was 2.73 million. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2024 | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 97,385 | +30.8% |
| 2 | Los Angeles County Estimated | 92,259 | +10.6% |
| 3 | Miami-Dade County Estimated | 78,261 | -22.9% |
| 4 | Queens County Estimated | 75,075 | +46.7% |
| 5 | Cook County Estimated | 73,648 | +22.1% |
| 6 | Kings County Estimated | 58,553 | +29.1% |
| 7 | Dallas County Estimated | 55,809 | +40.8% |
| 8 | Bronx County Estimated | 45,502 | +54% |
| 9 | Maricopa County Estimated | 42,778 | +51.6% |
| 10 | King County Estimated | 40,186 | +24.9% |
| 11 | Broward County Estimated | 36,211 | -18.5% |
| 12 | New York County Estimated | 35,724 | +40.4% |
| 13 | Santa Clara County Estimated | 32,054 | -2.3% |
| 14 | Orange County Estimated | 30,873 | -11.3% |
| 15 | Tarrant County Estimated | 25,670 | +50.5% |
| 16 | Travis County Estimated | 25,478 | +39.9% |
| 17 | Middlesex County Estimated | 23,422 | +4.5% |
| 18 | Orange County Estimated | 23,385 | +9.2% |
| 19 | Bexar County Estimated | 22,913 | +51.7% |
| 20 | Palm Beach County Estimated | 22,570 | -21.7% |
| 21 | Mecklenburg County Estimated | 22,545 | +52% |
| 22 | Essex County Estimated | 22,164 | +14.9% |
| 23 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 21,054 | -7.9% |
| 24 | Collin County Estimated | 20,379 | +26.4% |
| 25 | Alameda County Estimated | 19,919 | -1% |
| 26 | Franklin County Estimated | 19,175 | +19.8% |
| 27 | Hudson County Estimated | 19,157 | +7.1% |
| 28 | Gwinnett County Estimated | 18,997 | +59.8% |
| 29 | Clark County Estimated | 18,957 | +1.4% |
| 30 | Fairfax County Estimated | 18,407 | +51.9% |
| 31 | San Diego County Estimated | 17,665 | -1.6% |
| 32 | Philadelphia County Estimated | 17,625 | -4.4% |
| 33 | Suffolk County Estimated | 15,604 | -7.9% |
| 34 | Salt Lake County Estimated | 15,386 | -16.3% |
| 35 | Sacramento County Estimated | 14,962 | -7.4% |
| 36 | Wayne County Estimated | 14,940 | +39.3% |
| 37 | Marion County Estimated | 14,520 | +18.9% |
| 38 | Prince George's County Estimated | 14,284 | +21.8% |
| 39 | Davidson County Estimated | 14,102 | +73.7% |
| 40 | Hennepin County Estimated | 13,849 | +50.1% |
| 41 | Arapahoe County Estimated | 13,716 | +39.9% |
| 42 | Suffolk County Estimated | 13,713 | +28.7% |
| 43 | Montgomery County Estimated | 13,668 | +10.2% |
| 44 | Union County Estimated | 13,625 | +0.7% |
| 45 | Denver County Estimated | 13,332 | +57.7% |
| 46 | Wake County Estimated | 13,146 | +47.4% |
| 47 | Jefferson County Estimated | 13,065 | +17.3% |
| 48 | Riverside County Estimated | 12,565 | +31.2% |
| 49 | Middlesex County Estimated | 12,532 | -4.8% |
| 50 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 12,012 | +22.1% |
| 51 | San Bernardino County Estimated | 11,937 | +13.5% |
| 52 | Westchester County Estimated | 11,872 | +27.8% |
| 53 | Lee County Estimated | 11,463 | +2.2% |
| 54 | Oakland County Estimated | 11,274 | +4.6% |
| 55 | DeKalb County Estimated | 11,192 | +48.3% |
| 56 | Fulton County Estimated | 10,889 | +58.5% |
| 57 | Osceola County Estimated | 10,724 | -0.7% |
| 58 | Passaic County Estimated | 10,591 | -3.8% |
| 59 | Denton County Estimated | 10,565 | +35.6% |
| 60 | Nassau County Estimated | 10,560 | +29% |
| 61 | San Mateo County Estimated | 10,320 | +2.2% |
| 62 | Fresno County Estimated | 9,987 | +19.5% |
| 63 | Western Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 9,818 | +35.6% |
| 64 | Shelby County Estimated | 9,807 | +77.7% |
| 65 | Bergen County Estimated | 9,564 | +4.8% |
| 66 | Cobb County Estimated | 9,463 | +50.4% |
| 67 | Essex County Estimated | 9,455 | +1.3% |
| 68 | Contra Costa County Estimated | 9,415 | -3.3% |
| 69 | Duval County Estimated | 9,257 | -17.4% |
| 70 | San Francisco County Estimated | 9,164 | -5% |
| 71 | Snohomish County Estimated | 9,129 | +31.5% |
| 72 | DuPage County Estimated | 9,113 | +3.1% |
| 73 | Providence County Estimated | 8,981 | +49.2% |
| 74 | Worcester County Estimated | 8,904 | +6.6% |
| 75 | Webb County Estimated | 8,592 | +201.8% |
| 76 | Capitol Planning Region Estimated | 8,117 | +11.9% |
| 77 | Adams County Estimated | 8,050 | +75.5% |
| 78 | Hamilton County Estimated | 7,911 | +24.8% |
| 79 | El Paso County Estimated | 7,898 | +89.9% |
| 80 | San Joaquin County Estimated | 7,870 | +22.4% |
| 81 | Jefferson Parish Estimated | 7,772 | +19.1% |
| 82 | Williamson County Estimated | 7,751 | +47.6% |
| 83 | Mercer County Estimated | 7,693 | +24.3% |
| 84 | Montgomery County Estimated | 7,498 | +40.5% |
| 85 | Tulsa County Estimated | 6,926 | +61.7% |
| 86 | Prince William County Estimated | 6,907 | +63.7% |
| 87 | Rockland County Estimated | 6,814 | +49.2% |
| 88 | St. Louis County Estimated | 6,608 | +39.3% |
| 89 | Collier County Estimated | 6,423 | -5.8% |
| 90 | Cuyahoga County Estimated | 6,382 | +6.6% |
| 91 | District of Columbia Estimated | 6,307 | -19.9% |
| 92 | Polk County Estimated | 6,277 | -13.2% |
| 93 | South Central Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 6,259 | +50.7% |
| 94 | Washington County Estimated | 6,085 | +11.8% |
| 95 | Oklahoma County Estimated | 6,049 | +82.5% |
| 96 | Norfolk County Estimated | 5,781 | -8% |
| 97 | Yuma County Estimated | 5,761 | +155.7% |
| 98 | Pima County Estimated | 5,716 | +20.4% |
| 99 | Milwaukee County Estimated | 5,688 | +8.6% |
| 100 | Durham County Estimated | 5,655 | +45.3% |
| 101 | Greenville County Estimated | 5,566 | +42.2% |
| 102 | Utah County Estimated | 5,555 | -16.3% |
| 103 | Douglas County Estimated | 5,394 | +24.1% |
| 104 | Lake County Estimated | 5,384 | -0.8% |
| 105 | Allegheny County Estimated | 5,237 | -16.4% |
| 106 | Baltimore city Estimated | 5,172 | +57.2% |
| 107 | Multnomah County Estimated | 5,163 | +23.5% |
| 108 | Greater Bridgeport Planning Region Estimated | 5,064 | +18.8% |
| 109 | Kern County Estimated | 5,062 | +18.8% |
| 110 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 5,056 | +41.6% |
| 111 | Loudoun County Estimated | 4,908 | +61.4% |
| 112 | Kent County Estimated | 4,866 | +31.8% |
| 113 | Fayette County Estimated | 4,834 | +23.3% |
| 114 | Guilford County Estimated | 4,784 | +46.9% |
| 115 | Pierce County Estimated | 4,728 | +23.7% |
| 116 | Richmond County Estimated | 4,724 | +30.9% |
| 117 | Ramsey County Estimated | 4,706 | +19.4% |
| 118 | Jackson County Estimated | 4,696 | +49.6% |
| 119 | Honolulu County Estimated | 4,676 | -1.7% |
| 120 | Rutherford County Estimated | 4,657 | +71.6% |
| 121 | East Baton Rouge Parish Estimated | 4,605 | +35.2% |
| 122 | Baltimore County Estimated | 4,576 | +7.7% |
| 123 | New Castle County Estimated | 4,521 | +27.2% |
| 124 | Johnson County Estimated | 4,446 | +16.3% |
| 125 | Dane County Estimated | 4,404 | -3.8% |
| 126 | Charleston County Estimated | 4,395 | +62.1% |
| 127 | Kane County Estimated | 4,372 | +39.8% |
| 128 | Bristol County Estimated | 4,371 | +13.7% |
| 129 | Pinellas County Estimated | 4,358 | -14% |
| 130 | Arlington County Estimated | 4,315 | +66.6% |
| 131 | Morris County Estimated | 4,304 | +4.4% |
| 132 | Washtenaw County Estimated | 4,237 | +16.9% |
| 133 | Jefferson County Estimated | 4,231 | +98.5% |
| 134 | Macomb County Estimated | 4,124 | +18.1% |
| 135 | Manatee County Estimated | 4,077 | +0.1% |
| 136 | Henrico County Estimated | 4,018 | +62.7% |
| 137 | Plymouth County Estimated | 3,998 | -3.9% |
| 138 | Pinal County Estimated | 3,982 | +53.7% |
| 139 | Delaware County Estimated | 3,972 | +9.5% |
| 140 | Bernalillo County Estimated | 3,810 | +31.2% |
| 141 | Erie County Estimated | 3,808 | -0.9% |
| 142 | Orange County Estimated | 3,795 | +27.8% |
| 143 | Lehigh County Estimated | 3,763 | -4.5% |
| 144 | Chatham County Estimated | 3,762 | +89.9% |
| 145 | Will County Estimated | 3,744 | +9% |
| 146 | Seminole County Estimated | 3,733 | -16.6% |
| 147 | Champaign County Estimated | 3,549 | +9.2% |
| 148 | Alexandria city Estimated | 3,541 | +59.7% |
| 149 | Montgomery County Estimated | 3,539 | -7.1% |
| 150 | Monmouth County Estimated | 3,478 | +14.3% |
| 151 | Butler County Estimated | 3,476 | +19.5% |
| 152 | Ventura County Estimated | 3,446 | +22.3% |
| 153 | Washoe County Estimated | 3,410 | +8.9% |
| 154 | Cameron County Estimated | 3,407 | +51% |
| 155 | Polk County Estimated | 3,395 | -4.4% |
| 156 | Camden County Estimated | 3,368 | +10.4% |
| 157 | Jefferson County Estimated | 3,354 | +75.1% |
| 158 | Somerset County Estimated | 3,352 | -2.6% |
| 159 | Albany County Estimated | 3,283 | +30.6% |
| 160 | Naugatuck Valley Planning Region Estimated | 3,236 | +28% |
| 161 | Cumberland County Estimated | 3,205 | +47.4% |
| 162 | Berks County Estimated | 3,180 | +8% |
| 163 | Stanislaus County Estimated | 3,153 | +6.7% |
| 164 | Knox County Estimated | 3,139 | +92.7% |
| 165 | El Paso County Estimated | 3,097 | +31.7% |
| 166 | Chesterfield County Estimated | 3,071 | +64.3% |
| 167 | Washington County Estimated | 3,030 | +151.7% |
| 168 | Marion County Estimated | 2,982 | +43.8% |
| 169 | Pulaski County Estimated | 2,941 | +142.1% |
| 170 | Monroe County Estimated | 2,913 | +1.5% |
| 171 | Benton County Estimated | 2,906 | +116.4% |
| 172 | Sarasota County Estimated | 2,896 | -6.6% |
| 173 | Wyandotte County Estimated | 2,872 | +29.5% |
| 174 | Pasco County Estimated | 2,817 | -5.4% |
| 175 | Burlington County Estimated | 2,787 | +7.9% |
| 176 | Hamilton County Estimated | 2,776 | +27.6% |
| 177 | Forsyth County Estimated | 2,770 | +37.6% |
| 178 | Horry County Estimated | 2,759 | +59.8% |
| 178 | Montgomery County Estimated | 2,759 | +30.1% |
| 178 | Richmond city Estimated | 2,759 | +48.5% |
| 181 | Ocean County Estimated | 2,758 | +33.8% |
| 182 | Hall County Estimated | 2,746 | +89% |
| 183 | Dakota County Estimated | 2,730 | +40.2% |
| 183 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 2,730 | +48.3% |
| 185 | Sedgwick County Estimated | 2,699 | +30.8% |
| 186 | Solano County Estimated | 2,698 | -1.4% |
| 187 | Richland County Estimated | 2,691 | +69.8% |
| 188 | Anoka County Estimated | 2,682 | +64.4% |
| 189 | Monterey County Estimated | 2,678 | +40.4% |
| 190 | Santa Barbara County Estimated | 2,670 | +13% |
| 191 | Lake County Estimated | 2,669 | +14.8% |
| 192 | Hamilton County Estimated | 2,652 | +123.4% |
| 193 | St. Louis city Estimated | 2,641 | +25.8% |
| 194 | Tippecanoe County Estimated | 2,612 | +23.3% |
| 195 | Orleans Parish Estimated | 2,591 | +17.7% |
| 196 | Hampden County Estimated | 2,585 | -2.9% |
| 197 | St. Lucie County Estimated | 2,527 | -24.6% |
| 198 | Chester County Estimated | 2,480 | -6.9% |
| 199 | Brevard County Estimated | 2,425 | -3.5% |
| 200 | Boulder County Estimated | 2,415 | +35% |
| 201 | Marion County Estimated | 2,408 | +6.4% |
| 202 | Madison County Estimated | 2,398 | +62.4% |
| 203 | Volusia County Estimated | 2,354 | +1.3% |
| 204 | Ingham County Estimated | 2,344 | +4.6% |
| 205 | Brazos County Estimated | 2,340 | +41.3% |
| 206 | Spartanburg County Estimated | 2,332 | +43.9% |
| 207 | Luzerne County Estimated | 2,320 | +3.8% |
| 208 | Clayton County Estimated | 2,301 | +57.3% |
| 209 | Ada County Estimated | 2,284 | +14.5% |
| 210 | Berkeley County Estimated | 2,282 | +93.1% |
| 211 | Lancaster County Estimated | 2,253 | +10.7% |
| 212 | Anne Arundel County Estimated | 2,223 | +18.6% |
| 213 | Sonoma County Estimated | 2,202 | +2.8% |
| 214 | Yakima County Estimated | 2,161 | +46.1% |
| 215 | Alachua County Estimated | 2,157 | -6.5% |
| 216 | Onondaga County Estimated | 2,139 | +16.1% |
| 217 | Allen County Estimated | 2,110 | +31% |
| 218 | Bucks County Estimated | 2,105 | -24.5% |
| 219 | Forsyth County Estimated | 2,091 | +33.4% |
| 220 | Tulare County Estimated | 2,086 | +38% |
| 221 | Dauphin County Estimated | 2,068 | -1% |
| 222 | Harrison County Estimated | 2,055 | +164.8% |
| 223 | Summit County Estimated | 2,035 | +35.5% |
| 224 | Yolo County Estimated | 2,034 | -2.6% |
| 225 | Bay County Estimated | 2,004 | +5.8% |
| 226 | Okaloosa County Estimated | 1,997 | +8.1% |
| 227 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,963 | +18% |
| 228 | Dutchess County Estimated | 1,926 | +53.6% |
| 229 | Atlantic County Estimated | 1,921 | -3.5% |
| 230 | Cherokee County Estimated | 1,915 | +81.9% |
| 231 | Adams County Estimated | 1,905 | +194.9% |
| 232 | Virginia Beach city Estimated | 1,904 | +56.6% |
| 233 | Marin County Estimated | 1,902 | +10.3% |
| 234 | Ector County Estimated | 1,885 | +20.5% |
| 235 | York County Estimated | 1,870 | +63.9% |
| 236 | Lafayette Parish Estimated | 1,867 | +50.1% |
| 237 | Midland County Estimated | 1,857 | +29.3% |
| 238 | Lexington County Estimated | 1,855 | +71.1% |
| 239 | Weld County Estimated | 1,849 | +32.8% |
| 240 | Minnehaha County Estimated | 1,833 | +269.6% |
| 241 | Howard County Estimated | 1,829 | +11.3% |
| 242 | Barnstable County Estimated | 1,827 | +1.8% |
| 243 | Imperial County Estimated | 1,811 | +24% |
| 244 | Montgomery County Estimated | 1,784 | +48.4% |
| 245 | Brazoria County Estimated | 1,780 | +24% |
| 246 | Canyon County Estimated | 1,766 | +36.4% |
| 247 | Merced County Estimated | 1,754 | +14.2% |
| 248 | Jefferson County Estimated | 1,732 | +65% |
| 249 | Norfolk city Estimated | 1,724 | +49.3% |
| 250 | St. Charles County Estimated | 1,723 | +23.5% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2024) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2024. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2024. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2024.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2024 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2024 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_counties_by_net_2024,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2024}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2024. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2024
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2024
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2024.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US counties by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 97,385 in 2024, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Natrona County, with -20 in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.