US counties by net international migration, July to June
Miami-Dade County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 3144 counties in 2023, at 101,531. Fremont County had the lowest, at -11. The median was 28 and the figure for the United States was 2.26 million. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2023 | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miami-Dade County Estimated | 101,531 | +2.6% |
| 2 | Los Angeles County Estimated | 83,416 | +33.9% |
| 3 | Harris County Estimated | 74,467 | +14.7% |
| 4 | Cook County Estimated | 60,294 | +95.4% |
| 5 | Queens County Estimated | 51,176 | +68.6% |
| 6 | Kings County Estimated | 45,346 | +89.3% |
| 7 | Broward County Estimated | 44,436 | +22.3% |
| 8 | Dallas County Estimated | 39,629 | +40.5% |
| 9 | Orange County Estimated | 34,819 | +21.2% |
| 10 | Santa Clara County Estimated | 32,817 | +26.1% |
| 11 | King County Estimated | 32,174 | +44% |
| 12 | Bronx County Estimated | 29,555 | +100.2% |
| 13 | Palm Beach County Estimated | 28,817 | +26.5% |
| 14 | Maricopa County Estimated | 28,220 | +47.5% |
| 15 | New York County Estimated | 25,444 | +101% |
| 16 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 22,862 | +8.9% |
| 17 | Middlesex County Estimated | 22,421 | -8.1% |
| 18 | Orange County Estimated | 21,406 | +29.6% |
| 19 | Alameda County Estimated | 20,121 | +27.4% |
| 20 | Essex County Estimated | 19,298 | +55.7% |
| 21 | Clark County Estimated | 18,688 | +134.8% |
| 22 | Philadelphia County Estimated | 18,436 | +55.6% |
| 23 | Salt Lake County Estimated | 18,377 | +65.4% |
| 24 | Travis County Estimated | 18,217 | +18.5% |
| 25 | San Diego County Estimated | 17,945 | +34.3% |
| 26 | Hudson County Estimated | 17,888 | +38.8% |
| 27 | Tarrant County Estimated | 17,060 | +42.6% |
| 28 | Suffolk County Estimated | 16,949 | +16.5% |
| 29 | Sacramento County Estimated | 16,161 | +44.4% |
| 30 | Collin County Estimated | 16,122 | +35.5% |
| 31 | Franklin County Estimated | 16,004 | +30% |
| 32 | Bexar County Estimated | 15,103 | +42.5% |
| 33 | Mecklenburg County Estimated | 14,834 | +26.2% |
| 34 | Union County Estimated | 13,524 | +60% |
| 35 | Middlesex County Estimated | 13,160 | +44.8% |
| 36 | Montgomery County Estimated | 12,398 | -10.3% |
| 37 | Marion County Estimated | 12,215 | +25.2% |
| 38 | Fairfax County Estimated | 12,116 | +10.8% |
| 39 | Gwinnett County Estimated | 11,889 | +20.1% |
| 40 | Prince George's County Estimated | 11,727 | -1.6% |
| 41 | Lee County Estimated | 11,215 | +29.4% |
| 42 | Duval County Estimated | 11,202 | +20.3% |
| 43 | Jefferson County Estimated | 11,136 | +76.8% |
| 44 | Passaic County Estimated | 11,007 | +80.4% |
| 45 | Osceola County Estimated | 10,799 | +11.8% |
| 46 | Oakland County Estimated | 10,778 | +51.8% |
| 47 | Wayne County Estimated | 10,728 | +70.9% |
| 48 | Suffolk County Estimated | 10,653 | +33.7% |
| 49 | San Bernardino County Estimated | 10,521 | +52.8% |
| 50 | San Mateo County Estimated | 10,102 | +32.4% |
| 51 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 9,838 | +10.4% |
| 52 | Arapahoe County Estimated | 9,801 | +70.6% |
| 53 | Contra Costa County Estimated | 9,735 | +32.1% |
| 54 | San Francisco County Estimated | 9,643 | +23% |
| 55 | Riverside County Estimated | 9,574 | +54.2% |
| 56 | Essex County Estimated | 9,333 | +9.5% |
| 57 | Westchester County Estimated | 9,293 | +47.7% |
| 58 | Hennepin County Estimated | 9,229 | +38.4% |
| 59 | Bergen County Estimated | 9,125 | +46.2% |
| 60 | Wake County Estimated | 8,918 | +37.5% |
| 61 | DuPage County Estimated | 8,842 | +51.1% |
| 62 | Denver County Estimated | 8,456 | +94.8% |
| 63 | Fresno County Estimated | 8,354 | +87.7% |
| 64 | Worcester County Estimated | 8,351 | +8.9% |
| 65 | Nassau County Estimated | 8,187 | +38.9% |
| 66 | Davidson County Estimated | 8,118 | +24.3% |
| 67 | District of Columbia Estimated | 7,870 | +4.8% |
| 68 | Denton County Estimated | 7,794 | +29.1% |
| 69 | DeKalb County Estimated | 7,548 | +20.3% |
| 70 | Capitol Planning Region Estimated | 7,252 | +23.5% |
| 71 | Western Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 7,239 | +13.8% |
| 72 | Polk County Estimated | 7,229 | +40.6% |
| 73 | Snohomish County Estimated | 6,944 | +62.3% |
| 74 | Fulton County Estimated | 6,870 | +12.3% |
| 75 | Collier County Estimated | 6,820 | +17.1% |
| 76 | Utah County Estimated | 6,633 | +61.9% |
| 77 | Jefferson Parish Estimated | 6,527 | +4.4% |
| 78 | San Joaquin County Estimated | 6,430 | +56.4% |
| 79 | Hamilton County Estimated | 6,341 | +37% |
| 80 | Cobb County Estimated | 6,290 | +10.7% |
| 81 | Norfolk County Estimated | 6,283 | -4% |
| 82 | Allegheny County Estimated | 6,265 | +79.5% |
| 83 | Mercer County Estimated | 6,188 | +36.7% |
| 84 | Providence County Estimated | 6,020 | -0.5% |
| 85 | Cuyahoga County Estimated | 5,989 | +31.5% |
| 86 | Shelby County Estimated | 5,520 | +32.1% |
| 87 | Washington County Estimated | 5,445 | +116% |
| 88 | Lake County Estimated | 5,428 | +62.6% |
| 89 | Montgomery County Estimated | 5,338 | +30.4% |
| 90 | Williamson County Estimated | 5,250 | +25.2% |
| 91 | Milwaukee County Estimated | 5,239 | -1.1% |
| 92 | Pinellas County Estimated | 5,068 | +24.7% |
| 93 | Honolulu County Estimated | 4,758 | +42.6% |
| 94 | Pima County Estimated | 4,746 | +39.9% |
| 95 | St. Louis County Estimated | 4,745 | +59.8% |
| 96 | Adams County Estimated | 4,586 | +82.9% |
| 97 | Dane County Estimated | 4,577 | -4.6% |
| 98 | Rockland County Estimated | 4,568 | +64% |
| 99 | Seminole County Estimated | 4,475 | +17.6% |
| 100 | Douglas County Estimated | 4,346 | +38.8% |
| 101 | Tulsa County Estimated | 4,283 | +14.3% |
| 102 | Greater Bridgeport Planning Region Estimated | 4,261 | +13.1% |
| 102 | Kern County Estimated | 4,261 | +60.7% |
| 104 | Baltimore County Estimated | 4,248 | -7% |
| 105 | Prince William County Estimated | 4,219 | +8.5% |
| 106 | Multnomah County Estimated | 4,181 | +115.4% |
| 107 | Plymouth County Estimated | 4,162 | +31.5% |
| 108 | El Paso County Estimated | 4,159 | +66.4% |
| 109 | South Central Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 4,152 | +35.1% |
| 110 | Morris County Estimated | 4,122 | +47.3% |
| 111 | Manatee County Estimated | 4,074 | +42.5% |
| 112 | Ramsey County Estimated | 3,942 | +16% |
| 113 | Lehigh County Estimated | 3,941 | +74% |
| 114 | Fayette County Estimated | 3,920 | +104.5% |
| 115 | Greenville County Estimated | 3,914 | +28.9% |
| 116 | Durham County Estimated | 3,891 | +35.3% |
| 117 | Bristol County Estimated | 3,843 | +10.2% |
| 118 | Erie County Estimated | 3,842 | +59.3% |
| 119 | Johnson County Estimated | 3,822 | +103.3% |
| 119 | Pierce County Estimated | 3,822 | +62.5% |
| 121 | Montgomery County Estimated | 3,808 | +69.7% |
| 122 | Kent County Estimated | 3,691 | +60.1% |
| 123 | Delaware County Estimated | 3,627 | +84.2% |
| 124 | Washtenaw County Estimated | 3,624 | +50.2% |
| 125 | Richmond County Estimated | 3,610 | +97.6% |
| 126 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 3,570 | +45.4% |
| 127 | New Castle County Estimated | 3,555 | +75.1% |
| 128 | Polk County Estimated | 3,553 | +66.7% |
| 129 | Macomb County Estimated | 3,492 | +68.4% |
| 130 | Somerset County Estimated | 3,440 | +50.1% |
| 131 | Will County Estimated | 3,434 | +85.7% |
| 132 | East Baton Rouge Parish Estimated | 3,406 | +9.6% |
| 133 | St. Lucie County Estimated | 3,353 | +41.3% |
| 134 | Oklahoma County Estimated | 3,315 | -6.9% |
| 135 | Baltimore city Estimated | 3,291 | +1.9% |
| 136 | Guilford County Estimated | 3,257 | +34.4% |
| 137 | Champaign County Estimated | 3,250 | +43% |
| 138 | Jackson County Estimated | 3,140 | +43.6% |
| 139 | Washoe County Estimated | 3,131 | +190.2% |
| 140 | Kane County Estimated | 3,128 | +123.4% |
| 141 | Sarasota County Estimated | 3,100 | +33.4% |
| 142 | Camden County Estimated | 3,051 | +52.4% |
| 143 | Monmouth County Estimated | 3,043 | +45.1% |
| 144 | Loudoun County Estimated | 3,041 | +13.2% |
| 145 | Pasco County Estimated | 2,978 | +27.3% |
| 146 | Orange County Estimated | 2,969 | +64.4% |
| 147 | Stanislaus County Estimated | 2,955 | +55.4% |
| 148 | Berks County Estimated | 2,945 | +95% |
| 149 | Butler County Estimated | 2,908 | +40.4% |
| 150 | Bernalillo County Estimated | 2,905 | +44.4% |
| 151 | Monroe County Estimated | 2,870 | +54% |
| 152 | Webb County Estimated | 2,847 | +77.4% |
| 153 | Ventura County Estimated | 2,818 | +42.5% |
| 154 | Bucks County Estimated | 2,788 | +95.1% |
| 155 | Solano County Estimated | 2,736 | +45.1% |
| 156 | Rutherford County Estimated | 2,714 | +27.1% |
| 157 | Charleston County Estimated | 2,712 | +49.3% |
| 158 | Chester County Estimated | 2,663 | +64.2% |
| 159 | Hampden County Estimated | 2,662 | +36.7% |
| 160 | Pinal County Estimated | 2,591 | +47.2% |
| 161 | Arlington County Estimated | 2,590 | +18.2% |
| 162 | Burlington County Estimated | 2,584 | +11.6% |
| 163 | Naugatuck Valley Planning Region Estimated | 2,529 | +22.7% |
| 164 | Albany County Estimated | 2,514 | +70.7% |
| 164 | Brevard County Estimated | 2,514 | +26.3% |
| 166 | Henrico County Estimated | 2,470 | +13.7% |
| 167 | Lancaster County Estimated | 2,434 | +90.3% |
| 168 | Santa Barbara County Estimated | 2,363 | +28.8% |
| 169 | El Paso County Estimated | 2,351 | +88.5% |
| 170 | Lake County Estimated | 2,325 | +35.7% |
| 171 | Volusia County Estimated | 2,324 | +33% |
| 172 | Alachua County Estimated | 2,306 | +22.2% |
| 173 | Marion County Estimated | 2,263 | +64.5% |
| 174 | Cameron County Estimated | 2,257 | +32.5% |
| 175 | Yuma County Estimated | 2,253 | +121.8% |
| 176 | Ingham County Estimated | 2,241 | +61.3% |
| 177 | Luzerne County Estimated | 2,236 | +99.8% |
| 178 | Alexandria city Estimated | 2,217 | +25.6% |
| 178 | Wyandotte County Estimated | 2,217 | +66.6% |
| 180 | Orleans Parish Estimated | 2,202 | +5.5% |
| 181 | Hamilton County Estimated | 2,176 | +2.1% |
| 182 | Cumberland County Estimated | 2,174 | +24.4% |
| 183 | Sonoma County Estimated | 2,141 | +66.6% |
| 184 | Jefferson County Estimated | 2,132 | +61.8% |
| 185 | Montgomery County Estimated | 2,121 | +19.6% |
| 186 | Tippecanoe County Estimated | 2,118 | -3.9% |
| 187 | St. Louis city Estimated | 2,100 | +80.7% |
| 188 | Dauphin County Estimated | 2,089 | +90.3% |
| 189 | Yolo County Estimated | 2,088 | +21% |
| 190 | Marion County Estimated | 2,073 | +297.1% |
| 191 | Sedgwick County Estimated | 2,064 | +133% |
| 192 | Ocean County Estimated | 2,062 | +59.5% |
| 193 | Lancaster County Estimated | 2,036 | +47.1% |
| 194 | Forsyth County Estimated | 2,013 | +71.8% |
| 195 | Ada County Estimated | 1,994 | +16.5% |
| 196 | Atlantic County Estimated | 1,990 | +55.6% |
| 197 | Chatham County Estimated | 1,981 | +60.8% |
| 198 | Dakota County Estimated | 1,947 | +21.5% |
| 199 | Jefferson County Estimated | 1,916 | +92.6% |
| 200 | Monterey County Estimated | 1,907 | +21.2% |
| 201 | Bay County Estimated | 1,895 | +35.4% |
| 202 | Anne Arundel County Estimated | 1,875 | -5.2% |
| 202 | Placer County Estimated | 1,875 | +63% |
| 204 | Chesterfield County Estimated | 1,869 | +31.4% |
| 205 | York County Estimated | 1,866 | +94% |
| 206 | Richmond city Estimated | 1,858 | +29% |
| 207 | Okaloosa County Estimated | 1,848 | +23.6% |
| 208 | Onondaga County Estimated | 1,843 | +41% |
| 209 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 1,841 | +86% |
| 210 | Clark County Estimated | 1,807 | +68.7% |
| 210 | Leon County Estimated | 1,807 | +40.1% |
| 212 | Barnstable County Estimated | 1,795 | +15% |
| 213 | Boulder County Estimated | 1,789 | +46% |
| 214 | Horry County Estimated | 1,727 | +21.1% |
| 215 | Marin County Estimated | 1,725 | +17% |
| 216 | Warren County Estimated | 1,676 | +76.1% |
| 217 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,664 | +36.1% |
| 218 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,656 | +41.9% |
| 219 | Howard County Estimated | 1,644 | -4.5% |
| 220 | Anoka County Estimated | 1,631 | +31.6% |
| 221 | Knox County Estimated | 1,629 | +30.7% |
| 222 | Spartanburg County Estimated | 1,621 | +69.7% |
| 223 | Allen County Estimated | 1,611 | +21.5% |
| 224 | Richland County Estimated | 1,585 | +19.5% |
| 225 | Forsyth County Estimated | 1,568 | +23.9% |
| 226 | Centre County Estimated | 1,565 | +36.1% |
| 227 | Ector County Estimated | 1,564 | -10.8% |
| 228 | Davis County Estimated | 1,554 | +95.7% |
| 229 | Merced County Estimated | 1,536 | +55.3% |
| 230 | Escambia County Estimated | 1,530 | +17.5% |
| 231 | Tulare County Estimated | 1,512 | +56% |
| 232 | Summit County Estimated | 1,502 | +17.2% |
| 233 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,481 | +68.3% |
| 233 | Monroe County Estimated | 1,481 | +11.4% |
| 235 | Yakima County Estimated | 1,479 | +170.4% |
| 236 | Madison County Estimated | 1,477 | +36.3% |
| 237 | Clayton County Estimated | 1,463 | +22.9% |
| 238 | Imperial County Estimated | 1,461 | +50% |
| 239 | Hall County Estimated | 1,453 | +27.3% |
| 240 | Midland County Estimated | 1,436 | +9.2% |
| 241 | Brazoria County Estimated | 1,435 | +25.7% |
| 242 | Anchorage Municipality Estimated | 1,424 | +28.1% |
| 243 | Northampton County Estimated | 1,403 | +56.8% |
| 244 | St. Charles County Estimated | 1,395 | +93.8% |
| 245 | Weld County Estimated | 1,392 | +29.6% |
| 246 | Warren County Estimated | 1,389 | +79.2% |
| 247 | Benton County Estimated | 1,343 | -10.9% |
| 248 | Canyon County Estimated | 1,295 | +54.2% |
| 249 | Cass County Estimated | 1,284 | +4.6% |
| 250 | Beaufort County Estimated | 1,281 | +54.3% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2023) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2023. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2023. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2023. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2023.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2023 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2023 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_counties_by_net_2023,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2023}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2023. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net international migration, July to June, 2023
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2023
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2023.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US counties by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Miami-Dade County, with 101,531 in 2023, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Fremont County, with -11 in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.