US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units)
Massapequa Park, NY had the highest homeownership rate (US, housing units) of 3214 cities in 2022, at 98.1%. Cudahy, CA had the lowest, at 11.9%. The median was 62.2% and the figure for the United States was 64.8%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massapequa Park, NY | 98.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 2 | Campton Hills, IL | 98.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 3 | St. John, IN | 97.4 | -0 pts |
| 4 | Richfield, WI | 97.4 | -0.5 pts |
| 5 | Fair Oaks Ranch, TX | 97.3 | +2 pts |
| 6 | Iowa Colony, TX | 97 | -0.4 pts |
| 7 | Western Springs, IL | 96.6 | -0.9 pts |
| 8 | Colleyville, TX | 95.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 9 | Heath, TX | 95.9 | +1.9 pts |
| 10 | Shorewood, IL | 95.7 | +3.7 pts |
| 11 | Minooka, IL | 95.4 | +3.8 pts |
| 12 | Burr Ridge, IL | 95.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 13 | Ham Lake, MN | 95.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 14 | Paradise Valley, AZ | 95.1 | +1.2 pts |
| 15 | Palos Heights, IL | 95.1 | -0.6 pts |
| 15 | Seven Hills, OH | 95.1 | +5.2 pts |
| 17 | Southlake, TX | 95 | -0.4 pts |
| 18 | East Grand Rapids, MI | 95 | +0.1 pts |
| 18 | Frederick, CO | 95 | +1.5 pts |
| 20 | Ringwood, NJ | 94.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 21 | Dayton, MN | 94.8 | -2 pts |
| 21 | Severance, CO | 94.8 | -1.8 pts |
| 23 | Helotes, TX | 94.4 | +2.1 pts |
| 24 | Homer Glen, IL | 94.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 25 | Frankfort, IL | 94.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 26 | East Bethel, MN | 94 | -1.3 pts |
| 26 | Fulshear, TX | 94 | 0 pts |
| 28 | Beverly Hills, MI | 93.9 | +1 pts |
| 29 | Hillsborough, CA | 93.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 30 | Andover, MN | 93.7 | -0 pts |
| 31 | Weddington, NC | 93.6 | -2.7 pts |
| 32 | Davenport, FL | 93.2 | +3.1 pts |
| 32 | Highland Village, TX | 93.2 | +1.9 pts |
| 32 | Madison, MS | 93.2 | -0.7 pts |
| 35 | Nolensville, TN | 93.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 36 | Garden City, NY | 93 | +0.5 pts |
| 37 | Clay, AL | 93 | +4.8 pts |
| 38 | Trussville, AL | 92.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 39 | Orinda, CA | 92.9 | -1.1 pts |
| 40 | Dardenne Prairie, MO | 92.8 | -2.9 pts |
| 41 | Timnath, CO | 92.7 | -2.6 pts |
| 42 | West University Place, TX | 92.6 | -0.1 pts |
| 43 | Syracuse, UT | 92.6 | +1 pts |
| 44 | Woodbury, NY | 92.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 45 | Winfield, IL | 92.6 | +1.4 pts |
| 46 | Salem, UT | 92.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 47 | Lino Lakes, MN | 92.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 48 | Winnetka, IL | 92.3 | +1.5 pts |
| 49 | Josephine, TX | 92.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 50 | Kinnelon, NJ | 92.1 | +1.6 pts |
| 51 | Bay Village, OH | 92 | -1 pts |
| 51 | Powell, OH | 92 | -1.5 pts |
| 53 | Franklin Park, PA | 91.9 | +3.2 pts |
| 54 | Murphy, TX | 91.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 55 | Lake Elmo, MN | 91.7 | -2.4 pts |
| 56 | Brentwood, TN | 91.6 | +0.8 pts |
| 57 | St. Michael, MN | 91.6 | -0 pts |
| 57 | Wildwood, MO | 91.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 59 | New Albany, OH | 91.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 60 | Huntertown, IN | 91.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 61 | Trophy Club, TX | 91.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 62 | Rolesville, NC | 91.1 | +3.8 pts |
| 63 | Highland, UT | 91.1 | +0.7 pts |
| 64 | Oakland, NJ | 91.1 | +2.3 pts |
| 65 | Yorktown, IN | 91 | -0.9 pts |
| 66 | New Lenox, IL | 91 | -0.1 pts |
| 67 | Helena, AL | 91 | +0.3 pts |
| 68 | Westchester, IL | 91 | -0.3 pts |
| 69 | Leawood, KS | 91 | +1.4 pts |
| 70 | Mokena, IL | 91 | +0.7 pts |
| 70 | Stallings, NC | 91 | -0 pts |
| 72 | Harrisburg, NC | 90.9 | +1.4 pts |
| 73 | Hillsdale, NJ | 90.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 74 | Clayton, CA | 90.7 | +1.6 pts |
| 75 | Waldwick, NJ | 90.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 76 | Victoria, MN | 90.6 | -2.3 pts |
| 77 | Pingree Grove, IL | 90.6 | +2.7 pts |
| 77 | Scarsdale, NY | 90.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 79 | West Point, UT | 90.6 | +1.7 pts |
| 80 | Celina, TX | 90.5 | +1.7 pts |
| 81 | Marco Island, FL | 90.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 82 | Glen Rock, NJ | 90.3 | -2.2 pts |
| 83 | Manhattan, IL | 90.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 84 | Greenville, WI | 90.2 | |
| 85 | Beachwood, NJ | 90 | -1 pts |
| 86 | Clinton, UT | 90 | +1.3 pts |
| 87 | Melissa, TX | 89.9 | +1.6 pts |
| 87 | Murrysville, PA | 89.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 89 | Fate, TX | 89.9 | -1.8 pts |
| 90 | Harrison, WI | 89.8 | -0.1 pts |
| 91 | Grosse Pointe Woods, MI | 89.8 | -0.8 pts |
| 92 | Oakland, TN | 89.7 | +1.8 pts |
| 93 | Champlin, MN | 89.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 94 | Central, LA | 89.7 | -0.6 pts |
| 94 | Plainfield, IL | 89.7 | -1.2 pts |
| 96 | Calimesa, CA | 89.6 | +2.4 pts |
| 96 | Choctaw, OK | 89.6 | +1.6 pts |
| 98 | North Ridgeville, OH | 89.6 | +1.8 pts |
| 98 | Sachse, TX | 89.6 | -1.6 pts |
| 100 | Alexandria, KY | 89.5 | +4 pts |
| 101 | Mountain Brook, AL | 89.4 | +2.5 pts |
| 102 | Huntley, IL | 89.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 103 | Hinsdale, IL | 89.4 | +1.7 pts |
| 104 | Montgomery, OH | 89.3 | -0 pts |
| 105 | Chelsea, AL | 89.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 106 | Otsego, MN | 89.2 | -2.5 pts |
| 107 | Macedonia, OH | 89.2 | -1.2 pts |
| 108 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA | 89 | +0.6 pts |
| 109 | Channahon, IL | 89 | -0.6 pts |
| 110 | La CaƱada Flintridge, CA | 89 | -0.8 pts |
| 111 | Prosper, TX | 88.9 | +1.4 pts |
| 112 | Suamico, WI | 88.9 | -0.5 pts |
| 113 | McCordsville, IN | 88.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 114 | Dyer, IN | 88.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 115 | Piedmont, CA | 88.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 116 | Muskego, WI | 88.7 | +1.2 pts |
| 117 | Queen Creek, AZ | 88.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 118 | Hudson, OH | 88.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 119 | Lavon, TX | 88.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 120 | Groveland, FL | 88.5 | +4.6 pts |
| 121 | Bella Vista, AR | 88.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 122 | Oswego, IL | 88.4 | +1 pts |
| 123 | Eagle Mountain, UT | 88.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 124 | Rogers, MN | 88.3 | +1.9 pts |
| 125 | Cottage Grove, MN | 88.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 126 | Town and Country, MO | 88 | +0.4 pts |
| 127 | Franklin Lakes, NJ | 88 | -0.6 pts |
| 128 | Summerfield, NC | 88 | +0.5 pts |
| 129 | Youngsville, LA | 87.9 | -2.9 pts |
| 130 | Berthoud, CO | 87.9 | +1.7 pts |
| 130 | Kaysville, UT | 87.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 132 | Edgewater, FL | 87.9 | +1.7 pts |
| 133 | River Forest, IL | 87.7 | -1.6 pts |
| 134 | Hugo, MN | 87.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 135 | Lemont, IL | 87.7 | +1.1 pts |
| 136 | Hopatcong, NJ | 87.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 137 | Germantown, TN | 87.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 138 | Smithville, MO | 87.6 | -1.1 pts |
| 139 | Pinehurst, NC | 87.5 | +1.6 pts |
| 140 | Crestwood, MO | 87.5 | -0.6 pts |
| 140 | Tinley Park, IL | 87.5 | +1.4 pts |
| 142 | Bellaire, TX | 87.4 | -1.3 pts |
| 143 | New Franklin, OH | 87.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 144 | Lakeville, MN | 87.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 145 | Northbrook, IL | 87.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 146 | Wilmette, IL | 87.3 | -0.7 pts |
| 147 | Santaquin, UT | 87.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 148 | Livonia, MI | 87.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 149 | Winterville, NC | 87.2 | +3 pts |
| 150 | Lake Forest, IL | 87.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 151 | Royse City, TX | 87.1 | +1.4 pts |
| 152 | Avon, OH | 87.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 153 | Saratoga, CA | 87.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 154 | Lago Vista, TX | 86.9 | +2.4 pts |
| 155 | Danville, CA | 86.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 156 | Springboro, OH | 86.8 | +1.8 pts |
| 157 | Eagle, ID | 86.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 158 | Floral Park, NY | 86.7 | +2.7 pts |
| 159 | Rosemount, MN | 86.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 160 | Tega Cay, SC | 86.6 | +1.8 pts |
| 161 | Centerville, UT | 86.6 | +1.4 pts |
| 161 | Chanhassen, MN | 86.6 | -1.3 pts |
| 163 | Munster, IN | 86.5 | +0.1 pts |
| 164 | Erie, CO | 86.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 165 | Morton Grove, IL | 86.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 166 | Jefferson Hills, PA | 86.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 167 | Bartlett, IL | 86.4 | +2.2 pts |
| 168 | Alpine, UT | 86.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 169 | Middleton, ID | 86.3 | -2.4 pts |
| 170 | Parkland, FL | 86.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 170 | Riverton, UT | 86.3 | -1.1 pts |
| 172 | Mapleton, UT | 86.2 | -1.7 pts |
| 172 | Mount Washington, KY | 86.2 | +1.4 pts |
| 174 | Amherst, OH | 86.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 174 | Farmington, MN | 86.2 | -0 pts |
| 176 | Allen Park, MI | 86.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 176 | Farragut, TN | 86.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 178 | James Island, SC | 86.2 | +1 pts |
| 179 | Lumberton, TX | 86.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 179 | Prior Lake, MN | 86.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 181 | Crown Point, IN | 86.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 182 | Arlington, TN | 86.1 | +1.8 pts |
| 183 | Lake in the Hills, IL | 86.1 | +1.9 pts |
| 184 | Bowie, MD | 86.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 185 | Streamwood, IL | 86 | +0.5 pts |
| 186 | Glenn Heights, TX | 86 | +0.6 pts |
| 187 | Algonquin, IL | 85.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 188 | Orland Park, IL | 85.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 189 | Pleasant View, UT | 85.9 | -1.9 pts |
| 190 | Castle Pines, CO | 85.8 | -3.2 pts |
| 191 | Roy, UT | 85.7 | +1.6 pts |
| 192 | Cary, IL | 85.7 | -1.1 pts |
| 193 | Savage, MN | 85.7 | +1.5 pts |
| 194 | Horizon City, TX | 85.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 195 | South Plainfield, NJ | 85.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 196 | Alabaster, AL | 85.3 | -0.7 pts |
| 196 | Big Lake, MN | 85.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 198 | Blaine, MN | 85.3 | -0.9 pts |
| 199 | Buckeye, AZ | 85.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 200 | Atoka, TN | 85.2 | +2.2 pts |
| 201 | West Richland, WA | 85.2 | +2.4 pts |
| 202 | Harrisburg, SD | 85.1 | +0.7 pts |
| 202 | Manor, TX | 85.1 | +1.6 pts |
| 204 | Geneva, IL | 85.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 205 | Park Ridge, IL | 85.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 206 | Berkley, MI | 85 | +1 pts |
| 207 | Maple Valley, WA | 85 | +0.1 pts |
| 207 | Satellite Beach, FL | 85 | +3.4 pts |
| 207 | Solon, OH | 85 | +0.6 pts |
| 210 | Grantsville, UT | 85 | -1.8 pts |
| 211 | Vienna, VA | 85 | -1.3 pts |
| 211 | Zionsville, IN | 85 | +0.7 pts |
| 213 | Snoqualmie, WA | 85 | -1 pts |
| 214 | Norton Shores, MI | 84.9 | +1.4 pts |
| 215 | Fountain Hills, AZ | 84.9 | +2.8 pts |
| 216 | Norton, OH | 84.9 | +2.1 pts |
| 217 | Cooper City, FL | 84.8 | -0.7 pts |
| 217 | Mahomet, IL | 84.8 | -1.4 pts |
| 219 | Pike Road, AL | 84.8 | +1.2 pts |
| 219 | Ramsey, MN | 84.8 | -0.2 pts |
| 221 | Pewaukee, WI | 84.8 | 0 pts |
| 222 | Bartlett, TN | 84.7 | -1.4 pts |
| 222 | Wentzville, MO | 84.7 | +1.1 pts |
| 224 | Hyrum, UT | 84.6 | +2.4 pts |
| 225 | DeBary, FL | 84.6 | -4 pts |
| 226 | Miami Shores, FL | 84.4 | -1.8 pts |
| 227 | North Ogden, UT | 84.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 228 | Salem Lakes, WI | 84.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 229 | Sellersburg, IN | 84.4 | +4.5 pts |
| 230 | Cibolo, TX | 84.4 | -1.1 pts |
| 231 | Ramsey, NJ | 84.3 | -1.8 pts |
| 232 | Lindenhurst, NY | 84.2 | -1.1 pts |
| 233 | Sammamish, WA | 84.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 233 | South Jordan, UT | 84.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 235 | Fort Mill, SC | 84.2 | -1 pts |
| 236 | Mequon, WI | 84.2 | -2 pts |
| 237 | Highland Park, IL | 84.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 238 | Pelham, AL | 84.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 239 | Brecksville, OH | 84.1 | +1.7 pts |
| 240 | North Branch, MN | 84 | -0.5 pts |
| 241 | Montvale, NJ | 84 | -4 pts |
| 241 | Norwalk, IA | 84 | +2.3 pts |
| 243 | Haddonfield, NJ | 84 | +1.3 pts |
| 244 | Moraga, CA | 84 | -0.9 pts |
| 245 | North Myrtle Beach, SC | 84 | +4.4 pts |
| 246 | Blanchard, OK | 84 | +0.4 pts |
| 247 | Chatham, NJ | 83.9 | +2.8 pts |
| 247 | Mont Belvieu, TX | 83.9 | -3.1 pts |
| 249 | Ballwin, MO | 83.9 | -0.8 pts |
| 250 | Leland, NC | 83.9 | +1.7 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of all occupied housing units. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
Counts households (occupied housing units), not people. EU home ownership rates (population_in_owner_occupied_homes_share) count people living in owner-occupied dwellings, so they are not comparable.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 5 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units), 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units), 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/homeownership-rate/us-cities?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units), 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/homeownership-rate/us-cities?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units), 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/homeownership-rate/us-cities?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_homeownership_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units), 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/homeownership-rate/us-cities?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units), 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/homeownership-rate/us-cities?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/homeownership-rate/us-cities?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b25003.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by homeownership rate (US, housing units) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"homeownership_rate","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=homeownership_rate&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest homeownership rate (US, housing units)?
Massapequa Park, NY, with 98.1% in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest homeownership rate (US, housing units)?
Cudahy, CA, with 11.9% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B25003: owner-occupied housing units as a percentage of occupied housing units, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 cities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.
Homeownership rate (US, housing units): other rankings
- Cities in North Dakota
- Cities in Georgia
- Cities in Wyoming
- Counties in North Carolina
- Counties in New Jersey
- Counties in Alaska