Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate
Louisa County had the highest physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate of 99 counties in 2022, at 34.7%. Dallas County had the lowest, at 18.2%. The median was 27.7%. Source: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Map of counties, 2022
- Under 25
- 25 to 26
- 26 to 28
- 28 to 29
- 29 to 30
- 30 and over
Top 40 counties, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisa County | 34.7 | +5.5 pts |
| 2 | Clarke County | 33.1 | +1 pts |
| 3 | Lucas County | 33 | +3.4 pts |
| 4 | Crawford County | 32.9 | +1.8 pts |
| 4 | Wayne County | 32.9 | +3.1 pts |
| 6 | Wapello County | 32.2 | +1.6 pts |
| 7 | Appanoose County | 31.9 | +1.2 pts |
| 7 | O'Brien County | 31.9 | +5.2 pts |
| 9 | Wright County | 31.4 | +2.5 pts |
| 10 | Taylor County | 31.1 | +3.6 pts |
| 11 | Fayette County | 30.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 11 | Lee County | 30.7 | +3.1 pts |
| 13 | Cass County | 30.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 14 | Cherokee County | 30.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 15 | Franklin County | 30.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 16 | Ringgold County | 30.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 16 | Van Buren County | 30.2 | -0.9 pts |
| 18 | Jackson County | 30.1 | +2.9 pts |
| 19 | Tama County | 30 | +0.4 pts |
| 20 | Woodbury County | 29.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 21 | Montgomery County | 29.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 21 | Page County | 29.8 | +1.7 pts |
| 23 | Harrison County | 29.6 | +3.1 pts |
| 24 | Des Moines County | 29.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 24 | Keokuk County | 29.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 26 | Allamakee County | 29 | +0.5 pts |
| 26 | Clayton County | 29 | -0.7 pts |
| 26 | Mitchell County | 29 | +4 pts |
| 29 | Audubon County | 28.9 | +1.8 pts |
| 29 | Buena Vista County | 28.9 | -0.9 pts |
| 29 | Davis County | 28.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 29 | Greene County | 28.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 29 | Henry County | 28.9 | +2.1 pts |
| 34 | Humboldt County | 28.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 34 | Kossuth County | 28.8 | +1 pts |
| 36 | Monona County | 28.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 37 | Dubuque County | 28.6 | +5.4 pts |
| 38 | Floyd County | 28.4 | +2.1 pts |
| 38 | Mills County | 28.4 | +4.5 pts |
| 40 | Cerro Gordo County | 28.3 | +1.9 pts |
| 40 | Decatur County | 28.3 | +1 pts |
| 40 | Jefferson County | 28.3 | +1.6 pts |
| 43 | Benton County | 28.2 | +3.7 pts |
| 43 | Union County | 28.2 | +1.6 pts |
| 45 | Hardin County | 28.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 45 | Howard County | 28.1 | +1.8 pts |
| 45 | Osceola County | 28.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 48 | Adair County | 28 | +0.5 pts |
| 49 | Marshall County | 27.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 50 | Butler County | 27.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 50 | Poweshiek County | 27.7 | +2 pts |
| 52 | Black Hawk County | 27.6 | +2.3 pts |
| 52 | Sioux County | 27.6 | +5 pts |
| 54 | Clinton County | 27.5 | +0.1 pts |
| 55 | Pottawattamie County | 27.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 56 | Shelby County | 27.3 | +1.4 pts |
| 56 | Washington County | 27.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 58 | Emmet County | 27.2 | -0.7 pts |
| 59 | Calhoun County | 27.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 60 | Pocahontas County | 27 | -2.5 pts |
| 60 | Warren County | 27 | +5.3 pts |
| 62 | Adams County | 26.8 | -0.1 pts |
| 63 | Clay County | 26.7 | -0.8 pts |
| 64 | Dickinson County | 26.6 | +1.9 pts |
| 64 | Mahaska County | 26.6 | -0.6 pts |
| 66 | Chickasaw County | 26.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 66 | Hancock County | 26.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 66 | Iowa County | 26.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 69 | Muscatine County | 26.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 69 | Worth County | 26.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 71 | Carroll County | 26.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 71 | Monroe County | 26.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 73 | Ida County | 25.9 | -1.1 pts |
| 74 | Hamilton County | 25.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 74 | Sac County | 25.8 | -1.2 pts |
| 76 | Lyon County | 25.7 | -0.1 pts |
| 77 | Palo Alto County | 25.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 77 | Plymouth County | 25.6 | +1.9 pts |
| 79 | Jones County | 25.3 | -1.4 pts |
| 80 | Webster County | 25.2 | -3.1 pts |
| 81 | Cedar County | 24.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 81 | Guthrie County | 24.9 | -1.6 pts |
| 83 | Scott County | 24.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 84 | Buchanan County | 24.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 85 | Delaware County | 24.5 | -1.7 pts |
| 85 | Polk County | 24.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 87 | Boone County | 24.3 | +0.1 pts |
| 87 | Bremer County | 24.3 | +2.5 pts |
| 89 | Jasper County | 24.2 | -0.8 pts |
| 90 | Grundy County | 24 | +0.9 pts |
| 91 | Fremont County | 23.7 | -3.8 pts |
| 92 | Linn County | 23.3 | +1.3 pts |
| 93 | Marion County | 22.9 | -0.7 pts |
| 94 | Winnebago County | 22.7 | -2.5 pts |
| 95 | Madison County | 22.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 96 | Winneshiek County | 22 | -1.7 pts |
| 97 | Story County | 19.7 | +1.2 pts |
| 98 | Johnson County | 18.5 | -1.9 pts |
| 99 | Dallas County | 18.2 | -0.5 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Percentage of adults who did no physical activity or exercise outside their regular job in the past month, such as running, golf, gardening or walking for exercise. Model-based estimate for adults aged 18 and over from CDC PLACES. Crude prevalence, not age-adjusted.
US counties and cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). CDC PLACES combines Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) answers with local population data through multilevel regression and poststratification, so a county or city value is a model estimate, not a survey count. The year is the BRFSS survey year, not the release year. CDC says the method does not support tracking change in a place over time, and each annual release can change the model, so values for different years are not strictly comparable. A state is missing in a year when its BRFSS data did not meet standards (Kentucky and Pennsylvania in 2023, Florida in 2021). Connecticut counties appear as its nine planning regions from 2022; its eight former counties are not served. City values for 2021 come from the 2023 release, built on 2010 Census place boundaries; later years use 2020 boundaries.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.
Citation styles
APA 7
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence (Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.cdc.gov/places/
MLA 9
PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence, Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate, 2022. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4 Dec. 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-physical-inactivity-rate-county-estimate/iowa-counties?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2025. PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence. Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-physical-inactivity-rate-county-estimate/iowa-counties?period=2022.
Harvard
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025) PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence, Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/places/, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-physical-inactivity-rate-county-estimate/iowa-counties?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{centers_counties_in_iowa_by_2022,
author = {{Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}},
title = {{PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence: Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate, 2022}},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.cdc.gov/places/},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-physical-inactivity-rate-county-estimate/iowa-counties?period=2022. Publisher attribution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
TI - PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence: Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate, 2022
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/12/04
PB - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.cdc.gov/places/
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-physical-inactivity-rate-county-estimate/iowa-counties?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-physical-inactivity-rate-county-estimate/iowa-counties?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Iowa by physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"adult_physical_inactivity_rate_modelled","level":"province","within":"Iowa","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=adult_physical_inactivity_rate_modelled&level=province&within=Iowa&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate?
Louisa County, with 34.7% in 2022, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Which county has the lowest physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate?
Dallas County, with 18.2% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), physical inactivity in adults, crude prevalence. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Physical inactivity in adults, local model estimate: other rankings
- Counties in West Virginia
- Counties in North Carolina
- Counties in North Dakota
- Cities in New Jersey
- Cities in Iowa
- Cities in Indiana