Municipalities in Granada province by active companies
Granada had the highest active companies of 168 municipalities in 2016, at 18,313. Lobras had the lowest, at 4. The median was 53 and the figure for Granada province was 56,884. Source: the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
Top 40 municipalities, 2016
Full ranking
| Rank | Municipalities | 2016 | Change on 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Granada | 18,313 | +1.3% |
| 2 | Motril | 3,263 | +0.9% |
| 3 | Almuñécar | 1,859 | +2.2% |
| 4 | Albolote | 1,579 | +2.6% |
| 5 | Baza | 1,563 | +2.1% |
| 6 | Armilla | 1,433 | +2.9% |
| 7 | Maracena | 1,307 | +4.8% |
| 8 | Loja | 1,232 | +3.1% |
| 9 | Guadix | 1,227 | -1.8% |
| 10 | Atarfe | 1,177 | +7.3% |
| 11 | La Zubia | 1,149 | +4.2% |
| 12 | Las Gabias | 1,078 | +4.2% |
| 13 | Peligros | 1,034 | +4.4% |
| 14 | Ogíjares | 1,023 | +7.3% |
| 15 | Santa Fe | 941 | +1.1% |
| 16 | Churriana de la Vega | 913 | +4.5% |
| 17 | Huétor Vega | 789 | +5.3% |
| 18 | Salobreña | 630 | -1.3% |
| 19 | Padul | 521 | +3.4% |
| 20 | Monachil | 519 | +1.4% |
| 21 | Huétor Tájar | 514 | +2.4% |
| 22 | Cenes de la Vega | 504 | +7.5% |
| 23 | Huéscar | 496 | 0% |
| 23 | Vegas del Genil | 496 | -2.4% |
| 25 | Alhendín | 493 | +5.8% |
| 26 | Pinos Puente | 491 | -19% |
| 27 | Villa de Otura | 468 | +1.3% |
| 28 | Dúrcal | 459 | +0.2% |
| 29 | Íllora | 452 | -2.4% |
| 30 | Cúllar Vega | 447 | +4.2% |
| 31 | Gójar | 350 | +3.2% |
| 32 | Alfacar | 339 | +4.6% |
| 33 | Alhama de Granada | 337 | +5% |
| 33 | Chauchina | 337 | +2.1% |
| 33 | Pulianas | 337 | +0.9% |
| 36 | Órgiva | 318 | +1.3% |
| 37 | Cájar | 291 | +0.3% |
| 38 | Iznalloz | 247 | +2.1% |
| 39 | Cúllar | 245 | +3.8% |
| 40 | Fuente Vaqueros | 240 | +2.6% |
| 41 | Albuñol | 233 | -0.4% |
| 42 | Caniles | 231 | +0.4% |
| 43 | Montefrío | 228 | +2.7% |
| 44 | Jun | 201 | -2.9% |
| 45 | Lanjarón | 194 | -0.5% |
| 46 | Láchar | 185 | -0.5% |
| 47 | Moraleda de Zafayona | 184 | +5.1% |
| 48 | Benalúa | 176 | -1.7% |
| 49 | Cijuela | 172 | +2.4% |
| 50 | Güevéjar | 141 | +11.9% |
| 51 | Purullena | 140 | +3.7% |
| 52 | Gualchos | 138 | +13.1% |
| 52 | Moclín | 138 | +1.5% |
| 54 | Ugíjar | 136 | +2.3% |
| 55 | Güéjar Sierra | 130 | +6.6% |
| 56 | Lecrín | 124 | 0% |
| 57 | Huétor de Santillán | 120 | +2.6% |
| 57 | Vélez de Benaudalla | 120 | +8.1% |
| 57 | Zújar | 120 | +6.2% |
| 60 | Valle del Zalabí | 110 | +2.8% |
| 61 | Benamaurel | 108 | +3.8% |
| 61 | Salar | 108 | +10.2% |
| 63 | Castril | 107 | -6.1% |
| 64 | Puebla de Don Fadrique | 105 | 0% |
| 65 | Zafarraya | 103 | -4.6% |
| 66 | Villanueva Mesía | 102 | -2.9% |
| 67 | Valderrubio | 96 | |
| 68 | Dílar | 92 | +13.6% |
| 69 | Deifontes | 91 | +5.8% |
| 70 | Cádiar | 90 | +1.1% |
| 70 | Cuevas del Campo | 90 | +5.9% |
| 70 | Pinos Genil | 90 | -7.2% |
| 73 | Montejícar | 80 | 0% |
| 74 | Algarinejo | 75 | +2.7% |
| 75 | Molvízar | 74 | -2.6% |
| 76 | Trevélez | 67 | +1.5% |
| 77 | Cortes de Baza | 65 | -3% |
| 78 | Cogollos de la Vega | 63 | -1.6% |
| 79 | Nigüelas | 62 | +6.9% |
| 80 | La Malahá | 61 | -6.2% |
| 81 | Castilléjar | 60 | -3.2% |
| 82 | Villamena | 59 | +7.3% |
| 83 | Orce | 55 | -1.8% |
| 84 | Capileira | 53 | 0% |
| 85 | Huéneja | 52 | +2% |
| 86 | Galera | 51 | 0% |
| 87 | Campotéjar | 50 | +11.1% |
| 87 | Colomera | 50 | +6.4% |
| 87 | Nevada | 50 | +13.6% |
| 90 | Polopos | 48 | -2% |
| 91 | Benalúa de las Villas | 47 | +6.8% |
| 92 | La Taha | 46 | 0% |
| 93 | La Peza | 45 | +12.5% |
| 93 | Válor | 45 | -6.3% |
| 93 | Víznar | 45 | +4.7% |
| 96 | Beas de Granada | 44 | +7.3% |
| 96 | Dólar | 44 | +15.8% |
| 96 | Guadahortuna | 44 | -2.2% |
| 99 | Darro | 43 | 0% |
| 99 | El Valle | 43 | +7.5% |
| 99 | Freila | 43 | +13.2% |
| 99 | Jérez del Marquesado | 43 | +4.9% |
| 103 | Nívar | 42 | -2.3% |
| 104 | Escúzar | 41 | -10.9% |
| 104 | Jayena | 41 | +2.5% |
| 106 | Alpujarra de la Sierra | 40 | 0% |
| 106 | La Calahorra | 40 | +2.6% |
| 108 | Chimeneas | 39 | -7.1% |
| 109 | Aldeire | 38 | -2.6% |
| 109 | Diezma | 38 | -5% |
| 111 | Arenas del Rey | 36 | -10% |
| 111 | Pedro Martínez | 36 | +12.5% |
| 113 | Albondón | 35 | 0% |
| 113 | Bubión | 35 | -12.5% |
| 115 | Fonelas | 33 | +10% |
| 115 | Otívar | 33 | +22.2% |
| 115 | Torvizcón | 33 | -13.2% |
| 115 | Zagra | 33 | -2.9% |
| 119 | Bérchules | 32 | -5.9% |
| 119 | Gor | 32 | +3.2% |
| 121 | Montillana | 31 | -11.4% |
| 121 | Ventas de Huelma | 31 | -3.1% |
| 123 | Ítrabo | 30 | +36.4% |
| 123 | Pampaneira | 30 | +3.4% |
| 125 | Calicasas | 29 | +3.6% |
| 125 | Quéntar | 29 | +3.6% |
| 127 | El Pinar | 28 | +7.7% |
| 127 | Píñar | 28 | -6.7% |
| 127 | Torre-Cardela | 28 | +33.3% |
| 130 | Cogollos de Guadix | 27 | 0% |
| 131 | Cortes y Graena | 25 | -21.9% |
| 132 | Jete | 24 | +4.3% |
| 133 | Albuñuelas | 23 | 0% |
| 133 | Los Guájares | 23 | +15% |
| 133 | Pórtugos | 23 | 0% |
| 136 | Villanueva de las Torres | 22 | -8.3% |
| 137 | Santa Cruz del Comercio | 21 | +40% |
| 138 | Morelábor | 20 | +11.1% |
| 139 | Lanteira | 19 | -17.4% |
| 140 | Alquife | 18 | 0% |
| 140 | Murtas | 18 | +20% |
| 142 | Busquístar | 17 | -15% |
| 143 | Lentegí | 16 | +23.1% |
| 144 | Almegíjar | 14 | 0% |
| 144 | Dehesas de Guadix | 14 | -17.6% |
| 144 | Lugros | 14 | +7.7% |
| 147 | Gorafe | 13 | +8.3% |
| 148 | Alamedilla | 12 | +9.1% |
| 148 | Albuñán | 12 | 0% |
| 148 | Dúdar | 12 | 0% |
| 148 | Lújar | 12 | 0% |
| 148 | Sorvilán | 12 | +20% |
| 153 | Ferreira | 11 | +10% |
| 153 | Rubite | 11 | -8.3% |
| 155 | Cacín | 10 | 0% |
| 155 | Juviles | 10 | -9.1% |
| 157 | Alicún de Ortega | 9 | 0% |
| 157 | Beas de Guadix | 9 | 0% |
| 157 | Turón | 9 | 0% |
| 160 | Agrón | 8 | -11.1% |
| 160 | Huélago | 8 | -11.1% |
| 160 | Polícar | 8 | +60% |
| 163 | Cáñar | 7 | +40% |
| 163 | Marchal | 7 | -22.2% |
| 163 | Soportújar | 7 | 0% |
| 166 | Carataunas | 5 | 0% |
| 166 | Cástaras | 5 | 0% |
| 168 | Lobras | 4 |
Other periods
About this ranking
Active companies on 1 January (INE Central Business Directory, DIRCE).
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 5 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for 2016 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721). https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2026). Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721) (Municipalities in Granada province by active companies, 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721
MLA 9
Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721), Municipalities in Granada province by active companies, 2016. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 7 Oct. 2026, https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/active-companies/granada-province-municipalities?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2026. Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721). Municipalities in Granada province by active companies, 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/active-companies/granada-province-municipalities?period=2016.
Harvard
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2026) Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721), Municipalities in Granada province by active companies, 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/active-companies/granada-province-municipalities?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{instituto_municipalities_in_granada_province_2016,
author = {{Instituto Nacional de Estadística}},
title = {{Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721): Municipalities in Granada province by active companies, 2016}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/active-companies/granada-province-municipalities?period=2016. Publisher attribution: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721). https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - Instituto Nacional de Estadística
TI - Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721): Municipalities in Granada province by active companies, 2016
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - Instituto Nacional de Estadística
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/active-companies/granada-province-municipalities?period=2016
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/active-companies/granada-province-municipalities?period=2016.
N1 - Publisher attribution: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721). https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4721. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Municipalities in Granada province by active companies using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"active_companies","level":"municipality","within":"Granada","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=active_companies&level=municipality&within=Granada&limit=10
Questions
Which municipality has the highest active companies?
Granada, with 18,313 in 2016, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
Which municipality has the lowest active companies?
Lobras, with 4 in 2016.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Directorio central de empresas: empresas activas por municipio (tabla 4721). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 municipalities have no value for 2016 and are not ranked.
Active companies: other rankings
- Municipalities in Girona province
- Municipalities in Valencian Community
- Municipalities in Segovia province
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- EU regions (NUTS 2)