NUTS 3 areas of Italy by population density
Napoli had the highest population density of 102 areas in 2023, at 2,534.6 inhabitants per km². Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste had the lowest, at 37.9 inhabitants per km². The median was 180.1 inhabitants per km² and the figure for Italy was 198.1 inhabitants per km². Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2023 | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napoli | 2,534.6 | -0.3% |
| 2 | Monza e della Brianza | 2,166.3 | +0.4% |
| 3 | Milano | 2,074.8 | +0.5% |
| 4 | Trieste | 1,073 | -0.1% |
| 5 | Varese | 811.1 | +0.1% |
| 6 | Roma | 800.4 | +0.1% |
| 7 | Prato | 711.2 | +0.4% |
| 8 | Como | 513.3 | +0.2% |
| 9 | Lecco | 451.9 | +0.1% |
| 10 | Genova | 446.3 | 0% |
| 11 | Padova | 442.9 | +0.1% |
| 12 | Venezia | 433.2 | -0.1% |
| 13 | Bergamo | 409 | +0.3% |
| 14 | Rimini | 369.3 | -5.9% |
| 15 | Gorizia | 361.7 | +0.1% |
| 16 | Treviso | 356.9 | +0.1% |
| 17 | Caserta | 343.7 | +0.1% |
| 18 | Torino | 325 | -0.1% |
| 19 | Verona | 318.5 | +0.2% |
| 20 | Bari | 316.8 | -0.2% |
| 21 | Vicenza | 313.7 | +0.1% |
| 22 | Pistoia | 303.2 | +0.1% |
| 23 | Catania | 301.1 | -0.3% |
| 24 | Lodi | 298.7 | +0.5% |
| 25 | Firenze | 283.2 | +0.1% |
| 26 | Novara | 278.4 | +0.2% |
| 27 | Brescia | 277.8 | +0.3% |
| 28 | Bologna | 276.3 | +0.3% |
| 28 | Lecce | 276.3 | -0.5% |
| 30 | Livorno | 271.1 | -0.1% |
| 31 | Modena | 263.3 | +0.3% |
| 32 | Latina | 255.3 | -0% |
| 33 | Pescara | 254.4 | -0.2% |
| 34 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 254 | -0.4% |
| 35 | La Spezia | 244.9 | 0% |
| 36 | Palermo | 241.2 | -0.4% |
| 37 | Ancona | 235.5 | 0% |
| 38 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 231.3 | +0.3% |
| 39 | Taranto | 227 | -0.6% |
| 40 | Lucca | 218.5 | -0.1% |
| 41 | Ravenna | 216.2 | +0.2% |
| 42 | Salerno | 214.1 | -0.3% |
| 43 | Brindisi | 204 | -0.5% |
| 44 | Cremona | 202.2 | +0.2% |
| 45 | Ragusa | 196.4 | +0.5% |
| 46 | Fermo | 194.4 | -0.3% |
| 47 | Biella | 186.4 | -0.4% |
| 48 | Pavia | 184.3 | +0.4% |
| 49 | Messina | 183.8 | -0.4% |
| 50 | Siracusa | 183.2 | -0.3% |
| 51 | Imperia | 180.9 | 0% |
| 52 | Mantova | 179.3 | +0.3% |
| 53 | Savona | 173.1 | -0.1% |
| 54 | Pisa | 171.9 | +0.1% |
| 55 | Trapani | 169.2 | -0.5% |
| 56 | Forlì-Cesena | 165.1 | +0.2% |
| 57 | Ascoli Piceno | 164 | -0.4% |
| 58 | Massa-Carrara | 162.3 | -0.4% |
| 59 | Reggio Calabria | 161.1 | -0.7% |
| 60 | Teramo | 153.2 | -0.1% |
| 61 | Rovigo | 144.3 | -0.3% |
| 62 | Frosinone | 143.8 | -0.6% |
| 63 | Chieti | 143.3 | -0.3% |
| 64 | Avellino | 142.2 | -0.6% |
| 65 | Catanzaro | 141.5 | -0.4% |
| 66 | Pordenone | 139.8 | +0.2% |
| 67 | Pesaro e Urbino | 139.6 | +2.3% |
| 68 | Ferrara | 139.3 | 0% |
| 69 | Asti | 137.8 | -0.3% |
| 70 | Agrigento | 135.6 | -0.6% |
| 71 | Parma | 132.1 | +0.6% |
| 72 | Vibo Valentia | 131.4 | -0.4% |
| 73 | Benevento | 126.3 | -0.6% |
| 74 | Caltanissetta | 116.5 | -0.9% |
| 75 | Alessandria | 115 | -0.1% |
| 76 | Piacenza | 111.2 | +0.4% |
| 77 | Macerata | 109.4 | -0.4% |
| 78 | Udine | 108.8 | -0.1% |
| 79 | Arezzo | 103.8 | -0.2% |
| 80 | Perugia | 103 | -0.3% |
| 81 | Terni | 102.7 | -0.6% |
| 82 | Cosenza | 100.5 | -0.3% |
| 83 | Crotone | 93.7 | -0.5% |
| 84 | Viterbo | 88.5 | -0.1% |
| 85 | Trento | 88.4 | +0.5% |
| 86 | Foggia | 86.6 | -0.6% |
| 87 | Cuneo | 84.4 | +0.1% |
| 88 | Vercelli | 80.1 | -0.1% |
| 89 | Bolzano-Bozen | 72.7 | +0.4% |
| 90 | Campobasso | 72.3 | -0.4% |
| 91 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 71.1 | -0.1% |
| 92 | Siena | 68.4 | -0.3% |
| 93 | Enna | 60.3 | -1% |
| 94 | L’Aquila | 57.1 | -0.3% |
| 95 | Sondrio | 56.6 | 0% |
| 96 | Matera | 55.1 | -0.4% |
| 97 | Rieti | 54.9 | -0.4% |
| 98 | Belluno | 54.3 | -0.2% |
| 99 | Potenza | 52.6 | -0.8% |
| 100 | Isernia | 51.9 | -0.8% |
| 101 | Grosseto | 48.7 | -0.2% |
| 102 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 37.9 | -0.3% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Resident population divided by land area in km². World Bank figures use mid-year population and land area excluding inland water.
United States: Census Bureau population estimates for 1 July divided by land area (water excluded) from the latest Census Gazetteer files. US tables often give people per square mile; multiply persons per km² by 2.59 to compare.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Population density by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_d3dens). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_d3dens/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by population density using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_density","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_density&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest population density?
Napoli, with 2,534.6 inhabitants per km² in 2023, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest population density?
Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste, with 37.9 inhabitants per km² in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population density by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_d3dens). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Population density: other rankings
- Countries
- EU countries
- US states
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- US counties
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Municipalities of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)