Regions of Poland (NUTS 2) by net migration including statistical adjustment

Warszawski stołeczny had the highest net migration including statistical adjustment of 17 regions in 2016, at 16,485. Śląskie had the lowest, at -3,823. The median was -475 and the figure for Poland was 11,507. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Lowest-3,823Śląskie
Median-47517 regions
Poland11,507History

All regions, 2016

Warszawski stołeczny: 16,485 personsWarszawski stołeczny16,485Dolnośląskie: 4,708 personsDolnośląskie4,708Małopolskie: 4,157 personsMałopolskie4,157Pomorskie: 4,021 personsPomorskie4,021Wielkopolskie: 597 personsWielkopolskie597Podkarpackie: 67 personsPodkarpackie67Lubuskie: -46 personsLubuskie-46Łódzkie: -311 personsŁódzkie-311Opolskie: -475 personsOpolskie-475Kujawsko-pomorskie: -746 personsKujawsko-pomorskie-746Świętokrzyskie: -1,039 personsŚwiętokrzyskie-1,039Podlaskie: -1,100 personsPodlaskie-1,100Zachodniopomorskie: -1,420 personsZachodniopomorskie-1,420Mazowiecki regionalny: -2,987 personsMazowiecki regionalny-2,987Lubelskie: -3,123 personsLubelskie-3,123Warmińsko-mazurskie: -3,458 personsWarmińsko-mazurskie-3,458Śląskie: -3,823 personsŚląskie-3,823
persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankRegions2016
persons
Change on 2015
1Warszawski stołeczny16,485+3.7%
2Dolnośląskie4,708+200.3%
3Małopolskie4,157+96.5%
4Pomorskie4,021+107.4%
5Wielkopolskie597+290.1%
6Podkarpackie67+107.3%
7Lubuskie-46+97%
8Łódzkie-311+79%
9Opolskie-475+78.2%
10Kujawsko-pomorskie-746+70.2%
11Świętokrzyskie-1,039+53.3%
12Podlaskie-1,100+43.5%
13Zachodniopomorskie-1,420+37.8%
14Mazowiecki regionalny-2,987+38.1%
15Lubelskie-3,123+33.3%
16Warmińsko-mazurskie-3,458-12.6%
17Śląskie-3,823+39.6%

Other periods

About this ranking

Population change during the year minus natural change (live births minus deaths), including statistical adjustment. A negative value means the population fell by more than natural change explains (Eurostat demographic balance).

Eurostat calculates this as a residual, not by counting immigrants and emigrants, so it also absorbs census revisions and other statistical adjustments. For the EU it reflects migration to and from countries outside the EU. net_migration (World Bank, UN estimate) uses a different method, so the two series differ.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the regions are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Regions of Poland by net migration including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment","level":"region","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment&level=region&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which region has the highest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Warszawski stołeczny, with 16,485 in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which region has the lowest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Śląskie, with -3,823 in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Net migration including statistical adjustment: other rankings

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2): more rankings