Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June
Oakland County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 83 counties in 2023, at 10,778. Arenac County had the lowest, at 0. The median was 29 and the figure for Michigan was 41,616. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Map of counties, 2023
- Under 100
- 100 to 200
- 200 and over
Top 40 counties, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2023 | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakland County Estimated | 10,778 | +51.8% |
| 2 | Wayne County Estimated | 10,728 | +70.9% |
| 3 | Kent County Estimated | 3,691 | +60.1% |
| 4 | Washtenaw County Estimated | 3,624 | +50.2% |
| 5 | Macomb County Estimated | 3,492 | +68.4% |
| 6 | Ingham County Estimated | 2,241 | +61.3% |
| 7 | Kalamazoo County Estimated | 1,106 | +25.1% |
| 8 | Genesee County Estimated | 685 | +47.6% |
| 9 | Ottawa County Estimated | 579 | +84.4% |
| 10 | Berrien County Estimated | 524 | +100% |
| 11 | Branch County Estimated | 291 | +54% |
| 12 | Calhoun County Estimated | 283 | +97.9% |
| 13 | Eaton County Estimated | 257 | +39.7% |
| 14 | Jackson County Estimated | 219 | +140.7% |
| 15 | Monroe County Estimated | 210 | +68% |
| 16 | Saginaw County Estimated | 204 | +82.1% |
| 17 | Houghton County Estimated | 194 | +32.9% |
| 18 | Montcalm County Estimated | 181 | +108% |
| 19 | Isabella County Estimated | 167 | +153% |
| 20 | Allegan County Estimated | 142 | -5.3% |
| 21 | Van Buren County Estimated | 139 | +21.9% |
| 22 | Muskegon County Estimated | 138 | +31.4% |
| 23 | St. Clair County Estimated | 132 | +65% |
| 24 | Clinton County Estimated | 124 | +57% |
| 25 | Midland County Estimated | 113 | +17.7% |
| 26 | St. Joseph County Estimated | 88 | +49.2% |
| 27 | Livingston County Estimated | 75 | +82.9% |
| 27 | Mackinac County Estimated | 75 | +50% |
| 29 | Marquette County Estimated | 73 | +97.3% |
| 30 | Grand Traverse County Estimated | 68 | +11.5% |
| 31 | Lenawee County Estimated | 65 | -39.8% |
| 32 | Chippewa County Estimated | 63 | +34% |
| 33 | Newaygo County Estimated | 52 | +36.8% |
| 34 | Wexford County Estimated | 50 | +100% |
| 35 | Lapeer County Estimated | 49 | -41% |
| 36 | Barry County Estimated | 44 | +300% |
| 37 | Otsego County Estimated | 36 | +140% |
| 38 | Bay County Estimated | 34 | +100% |
| 38 | Huron County Estimated | 34 | +88.9% |
| 40 | Tuscola County Estimated | 32 | 0% |
| 41 | Mecosta County Estimated | 30 | +200% |
| 42 | Iosco County Estimated | 29 | +81.3% |
| 43 | Hillsdale County Estimated | 26 | +73.3% |
| 43 | Oceana County Estimated | 26 | -61.2% |
| 43 | Sanilac County Estimated | 26 | -10.3% |
| 46 | Manistee County Estimated | 25 | +66.7% |
| 46 | Ogemaw County Estimated | 25 | +47.1% |
| 48 | Dickinson County Estimated | 24 | +200% |
| 48 | Gratiot County Estimated | 24 | -7.7% |
| 50 | Shiawassee County Estimated | 23 | +35.3% |
| 51 | Benzie County Estimated | 21 | +40% |
| 51 | Cheboygan County Estimated | 21 | +40% |
| 53 | Missaukee County Estimated | 19 | +35.7% |
| 54 | Antrim County Estimated | 18 | 0% |
| 55 | Mason County Estimated | 17 | +21.4% |
| 56 | Osceola County Estimated | 16 | +33.3% |
| 57 | Gladwin County Estimated | 14 | |
| 58 | Charlevoix County Estimated | 13 | -45.8% |
| 58 | Ionia County Estimated | 13 | 0% |
| 60 | Emmet County Estimated | 11 | +120% |
| 60 | Iron County Estimated | 11 | +450% |
| 62 | Leelanau County Estimated | 10 | -16.7% |
| 63 | Alcona County Estimated | 9 | 0% |
| 63 | Crawford County Estimated | 9 | +200% |
| 63 | Menominee County Estimated | 9 | +12.5% |
| 63 | Montmorency County Estimated | 9 | +800% |
| 67 | Cass County Estimated | 8 | -42.9% |
| 67 | Gogebic County Estimated | 8 | +166.7% |
| 69 | Delta County Estimated | 6 | +250% |
| 69 | Presque Isle County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 69 | Schoolcraft County Estimated | 6 | -14.3% |
| 72 | Kalkaska County Estimated | 5 | +25% |
| 73 | Lake County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 74 | Alpena County Estimated | 3 | -25% |
| 75 | Luce County Estimated | 2 | +300% |
| 75 | Ontonagon County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 75 | Oscoda County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 75 | Roscommon County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 79 | Alger County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 79 | Baraga County Estimated | 1 | |
| 79 | Clare County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 79 | Keweenaw County Estimated | 1 | |
| 83 | Arenac County Estimated | 0 |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year.
More on how it is measured
- United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas.
- Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents.
- Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year.
- United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June, 2023) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June, 2023. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/michigan-counties?period=2023. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June, 2023. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/michigan-counties?period=2023.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June, 2023 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/michigan-counties?period=2023 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_michigan_by_2023,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June, 2023}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/michigan-counties?period=2023. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June, 2023
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/michigan-counties?period=2023
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/michigan-counties?period=2023.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Michigan by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Michigan","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Michigan&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Oakland County, with 10,778 in 2023, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Arenac County, with 0 in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.