Municipalities in Pontevedra province by average net income per household

Name: Municipalities in Pontevedra province by average net income per household, 2016
Creator: Instituto Nacional de Estadística
License: INE reuse terms (attribution required)

Nigrán had the highest average net income per household of 61 municipalities in 2016, at €32,921. A Lama had the lowest, at €15,392. The median was €24,511 and the figure for Pontevedra province was €27,364. Source: the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Highest32,921Nigrán

Lowest15,392A Lama

Median24,51161 municipalities

Pontevedra province27,364History

Top 40 municipalities, 2016

CSV Chart (SVG)

EUR. Source: INE. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	2016 EUR	Change on 2015
1	Nigrán	32,921	+4.1%
2	Vigo	31,139	+0.2%
3	Poio	29,868	+2%
4	Mos	29,865	+2.5%
5	Baiona	29,636	+4%
6	Redondela	29,232	+2.9%
7	Pontevedra	29,039	+1.2%
8	Valga	28,566	+4.9%
9	Gondomar	28,507	+3.1%
10	Mondariz-Balneario	28,196	-3.9%
11	Catoira	27,254	+5.1%
12	Cangas	27,080	+4.7%
13	Soutomaior	26,594	+4.2%
14	Ribadumia	26,499	+1.2%
15	Sanxenxo	26,428	+3.5%
16	O Porriño	26,360	+2.9%
17	Vilaboa	26,183	+2.3%
18	Dozón	26,101	+4.4%
19	Moaña	25,933	+3.6%
20	Pontecesures	25,862	+2.4%
21	Moraña	25,743	+2.5%
22	A Illa de Arousa	25,702	+0.2%
23	Portas	25,700	+1.8%
24	Meaño	25,256	+1.7%
25	Caldas de Reis	25,210	+3.1%
26	Meis	25,198	+2.9%
27	A Estrada	25,111	+2%
28	Marín	24,926	+2.7%
29	Vilagarcía de Arousa	24,917	+2.2%
30	Cambados	24,757	+12.8%
31	Cerdedo-Cotobade	24,511	n/a
32	Salceda de Caselas	24,490	+4.4%
33	Bueu	24,485	+2.4%
33	Tui	24,485	+0.3%
35	Vilanova de Arousa	24,475	+5.1%
36	Pazos de Borbén	24,217	+2.8%
37	Campo Lameiro	24,198	+3.7%
38	A Guarda	24,104	+2.2%
39	Oia	24,058	-1.8%
40	Lalín	23,762	+4.7%
41	O Grove	23,741	+1.9%
42	Cuntis	23,283	+1%
43	O Rosal	23,201	+1.3%
44	Rodeiro	23,142	+3%
45	Mondariz	23,139	+2.8%
46	Barro	22,972	+1.4%
47	Silleda	22,917	+1.6%
48	Fornelos de Montes	22,456	-0.5%
49	Tomiño	21,739	+0.6%
50	Forcarei	21,565	+6.4%
51	Ponteareas	20,932	+2.1%
52	As Neves	20,845	+1.5%
53	Ponte Caldelas	20,786	+0.2%
54	Vila de Cruces	20,190	-0.4%
55	Salvaterra de Miño	20,098	+2.1%
56	Crecente	19,732	+0.2%
57	Arbo	19,480	+1.8%
58	A Cañiza	18,281	+0.7%
59	Covelo	17,819	+0.6%
60	Agolada	17,235	+3%
61	A Lama	15,392	-0.7%

Other periods

About this ranking

Average annual net income per household (INE household income distribution atlas).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 2 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for 2016 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: renta neta media por hogar, municipios. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=31160. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Pontevedra province by average net income per household using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"net_income_per_household","level":"municipality","within":"Pontevedra","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_income_per_household&level=municipality&within=Pontevedra&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest average net income per household?

Nigrán, with €32,921 in 2016, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Which municipality has the lowest average net income per household?

A Lama, with €15,392 in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: renta neta media por hogar, municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-07. 2 municipalities have no value for 2016 and are not ranked.