Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly)

Coconino County had the highest fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly) of 15 counties in 2016, at $761. Graham County had the lowest, at $467. The median was $596. Source: the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest761Coconino County
Lowest467Graham County
Median59615 counties

Map of counties, 2016

Apache County: 552 USDCochise County: 625 USDCoconino County: 761 USDGila County: 636 USDGraham County: 467 USDGreenlee County: 507 USDLa Paz County: 527 USDMaricopa County: 596 USDMohave County: 505 USDNavajo County: 609 USDPima County: 532 USDPinal County: 596 USDSanta Cruz County: 519 USDYavapai County: 660 USDYuma County: 610 USD
  • Under 520
  • 520 to 540
  • 540 to 600
  • 600 to 630
  • 630 and over
USD, 2016. Source: HUD, HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. Boundaries: U.S. Census Bureau cartographic boundary files.

All counties, 2016

Coconino County: 761 USDCoconino County761Yavapai County: 660 USDYavapai County660Gila County: 636 USDGila County636Cochise County: 625 USDCochise County625Yuma County: 610 USDYuma County610Navajo County: 609 USDNavajo County609Maricopa County: 596 USDMaricopa County596Pinal County: 596 USDPinal County596Apache County: 552 USDApache County552Pima County: 532 USDPima County532La Paz County: 527 USDLa Paz County527Santa Cruz County: 519 USDSanta Cruz County519Greenlee County: 507 USDGreenlee County507Mohave County: 505 USDMohave County505Graham County: 467 USDGraham County467Coconino County: 761 USDCoconino County761Yavapai County: 660 USDYavapai County660Gila County: 636 USDGila County636Cochise County: 625 USDCochise County625Yuma County: 610 USDYuma County610Navajo County: 609 USDNavajo County609Maricopa County: 596 USDMaricopa County596Pinal County: 596 USDPinal County596Apache County: 552 USDApache County552Pima County: 532 USDPima County532La Paz County: 527 USDLa Paz County527Santa Cruz County: 519 USDSanta Cruz County519Greenlee County: 507 USDGreenlee County507Mohave County: 505 USDMohave County505Graham County: 467 USDGraham County467
USD. Source: HUD, HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankCounties2016
USD
Change on 2015
1Coconino County761+7.2%
2Yavapai County660+18.9%
3Gila County636+6.5%
4Cochise County625+7.6%
5Yuma County610+0.8%
6Navajo County609+14%
7Maricopa County596+2.4%
7Pinal County596+2.4%
9Apache County552+41.9%
10Pima County532+8.8%
11La Paz County527-1.7%
12Santa Cruz County519-4.6%
13Greenlee County507+10.7%
14Mohave County505+5.9%
15Graham County467+2.9%

Other periods

About this ranking

Monthly gross rent, in US dollars, that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) sets for an efficiency (a unit with no separate bedroom) in the HUD area that contains the county.

More on how it is measured
  • Gross rent is the rent plus all utilities paid by the tenant except telephone, cable or satellite television and internet.
  • HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the 40th percentile of gross rents paid by recent movers for standard-quality rental units, from American Community Survey data brought forward to the fiscal year; until 2018 a few metropolitan areas were set at the 50th percentile.
  • They set payment standards for Housing Choice Vouchers and rent ceilings in other HUD programs.

A policy benchmark, not a measured rent: it is lower than the median rent by design and differs from the Census Bureau median gross rent. HUD sets one value per HUD area, a metropolitan area (sometimes split into HUD Metro FMR Areas) or a non-metropolitan county, so every county of a metropolitan area shows the same figure. Counties in the six New England states have no value, because HUD defines their areas by town and a county can span several areas. Where HUD splits off part of a county, the county value is the rest of the county: Howard County, Maryland, without Columbia until FY2015, and Crawford County, Missouri, without its part of Sullivan. The year is HUD's federal fiscal year: FY2027 runs from 1 October 2026 to 30 September 2027.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD USER. HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. (2016). HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars (Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly), 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx

MLA 9

HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars, Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly), 2016. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, 25 July 2016, https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/fair-market-rent-efficiency/arizona-counties?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. 2016. HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly), 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/fair-market-rent-efficiency/arizona-counties?period=2016.

Harvard

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research (2016) HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars, Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly), 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/fair-market-rent-efficiency/arizona-counties?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{department_counties_in_arizona_by_2016,
  author = {{U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research}},
  title = {{HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars: Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly), 2016}},
  year = {2016},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/fair-market-rent-efficiency/arizona-counties?period=2016. Publisher attribution: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD USER. HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research
TI  - HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars: Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly), 2016
PY  - 2016
DA  - 2016/07/25
PB  - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/fair-market-rent-efficiency/arizona-counties?period=2016
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/fair-market-rent-efficiency/arizona-counties?period=2016.
N1  - Publisher attribution: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD USER. HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2016f/FY2016F-4050-RevFinal4.xlsx. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  - 
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Counties in Arizona by fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"fair_market_rent_0br","level":"province","within":"Arizona","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=fair_market_rent_0br&level=province&within=Arizona&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which county has the highest fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly)?

Coconino County, with $761 in 2016, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.

Which county has the lowest fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly)?

Graham County, with $467 in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, HUD Fair Market Rents by county: efficiency, monthly gross rent in dollars. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Fair Market Rent, efficiency (HUD, monthly): other rankings

Counties in Arizona: more rankings