Cities in California by employed residents
Los Angeles, CA had the highest employed residents of 279 cities in 2016, at 1.88 million. Corcoran, CA had the lowest, at 5,040. The median was 29,635. Source: the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Top 40 cities, 2016
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2016 | Change on 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA | 1,883,974 | +0.7% |
| 2 | San Diego, CA | 670,591 | +1.5% |
| 3 | San Jose, CA | 515,990 | +0.3% |
| 4 | San Francisco, CA | 496,449 | -4.9% |
| 5 | Long Beach, CA | 234,697 | +6.9% |
| 6 | Sacramento, CA | 234,476 | +10.6% |
| 7 | Oakland, CA | 224,635 | +14.2% |
| 8 | Fresno, CA | 218,891 | +4.6% |
| 9 | Anaheim, CA | 168,536 | +5.2% |
| 10 | Bakersfield, CA | 166,109 | +1.9% |
| 11 | Santa Ana, CA | 151,541 | +1.4% |
| 12 | Riverside, CA | 138,899 | +0.6% |
| 13 | Irvine, CA | 138,483 | +9.4% |
| 14 | Stockton, CA | 126,211 | +9.5% |
| 15 | Chula Vista, CA | 119,471 | +5.9% |
| 16 | Fremont, CA | 114,934 | +3.3% |
| 17 | Santa Clarita, CA | 111,573 | +25% |
| 18 | Huntington Beach, CA | 102,209 | -0.8% |
| 19 | Oxnard, CA | 93,484 | -0.5% |
| 20 | Santa Rosa, CA | 92,908 | +10.5% |
| 21 | Glendale, CA | 90,700 | -3.6% |
| 22 | Modesto, CA | 88,514 | +2.9% |
| 23 | San Bernardino, CA | 88,151 | +15.9% |
| 24 | Fontana, CA | 87,633 | -0.4% |
| 25 | Moreno Valley, CA | 84,653 | +0.4% |
| 26 | Sunnyvale, CA | 83,408 | +2.3% |
| 27 | Oceanside, CA | 83,278 | +8.4% |
| 28 | Garden Grove, CA | 82,515 | +6.1% |
| 29 | Hayward, CA | 82,301 | +13.5% |
| 30 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 79,012 | -9.5% |
| 31 | Elk Grove, CA | 75,698 | +1.1% |
| 32 | Salinas, CA | 75,452 | +4.5% |
| 33 | Ontario, CA | 73,818 | -3.5% |
| 34 | Pasadena, CA | 73,095 | +0.7% |
| 35 | Torrance, CA | 71,776 | -2% |
| 36 | Escondido, CA | 70,936 | +9.4% |
| 37 | Orange, CA | 70,773 | +3% |
| 38 | Corona, CA | 70,354 | -6.9% |
| 39 | Palmdale, CA | 70,117 | +20.8% |
| 40 | Pomona, CA | 69,154 | +11.8% |
| 41 | Fullerton, CA | 68,253 | +2.5% |
| 42 | Santa Clara, CA | 66,482 | +1.8% |
| 43 | Lancaster, CA | 65,726 | +12.4% |
| 44 | Simi Valley, CA | 64,729 | -0.8% |
| 45 | Roseville, CA | 64,365 | +6% |
| 46 | Costa Mesa, CA | 63,629 | +2.7% |
| 47 | Concord, CA | 62,631 | +1.5% |
| 48 | Thousand Oaks, CA | 61,849 | -1.8% |
| 49 | Berkeley, CA | 61,731 | +4.9% |
| 50 | Visalia, CA | 59,425 | +6.5% |
| 51 | Vallejo, CA | 59,237 | +12% |
| 52 | San Mateo, CA | 57,121 | -3.7% |
| 53 | Daly City, CA | 57,113 | -4.7% |
| 54 | Downey, CA | 56,348 | +6.2% |
| 55 | Richmond, CA | 55,986 | +13.4% |
| 56 | San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA | 55,602 | +4.5% |
| 57 | Burbank, CA | 54,072 | -0.2% |
| 58 | Antioch, CA | 53,901 | +14.9% |
| 59 | Inglewood, CA | 53,592 | +10.9% |
| 60 | West Covina, CA | 53,122 | +8.7% |
| 61 | Fairfield, CA | 52,851 | +8.2% |
| 62 | Carlsbad, CA | 52,050 | +2.3% |
| 63 | Santa Monica, CA | 50,710 | -3% |
| 64 | El Monte, CA | 49,149 | +3.6% |
| 65 | Norwalk, CA | 48,621 | +4.4% |
| 66 | Clovis, CA | 48,617 | +2.9% |
| 67 | Santa Maria, CA | 48,072 | +6.9% |
| 68 | Santa Barbara, CA | 46,934 | -3.9% |
| 69 | Vista, CA | 46,920 | +11.9% |
| 70 | San Leandro, CA | 46,617 | +5.6% |
| 71 | Temecula, CA | 45,968 | -7.3% |
| 72 | Mission Viejo, CA | 45,678 | -4.2% |
| 73 | Mountain View, CA | 45,107 | -5.7% |
| 74 | Chico, CA | 44,865 | +1.1% |
| 75 | El Cajon, CA | 44,814 | +6.2% |
| 76 | Victorville, CA | 44,745 | +9% |
| 77 | Livermore, CA | 44,627 | -0.2% |
| 78 | Carson, CA | 44,605 | +5.5% |
| 79 | South Gate, CA | 43,934 | +11.6% |
| 80 | Murrieta, CA | 43,890 | -10.4% |
| 81 | Redwood City, CA | 43,469 | -7.2% |
| 82 | Vacaville, CA | 43,053 | +2.2% |
| 83 | Lake Forest, CA | 42,981 | -3.8% |
| 84 | Rialto, CA | 42,909 | +6.4% |
| 85 | Hawthorne, CA | 42,823 | +3.7% |
| 86 | San Marcos, CA | 42,453 | +10.7% |
| 87 | Buena Park, CA | 42,337 | +11% |
| 88 | Jurupa Valley, CA | 42,278 | +2.2% |
| 89 | Compton, CA | 42,147 | +18.4% |
| 90 | Lakewood, CA | 41,870 | +5.2% |
| 91 | Newport Beach, CA | 41,517 | -4.3% |
| 92 | Westminster, CA | 41,159 | +3.6% |
| 93 | Alhambra, CA | 41,100 | -4.1% |
| 94 | Whittier, CA | 40,883 | +1.2% |
| 95 | San Ramon, CA | 40,682 | +7.9% |
| 96 | Napa, CA | 40,660 | +2% |
| 97 | Tustin, CA | 40,329 | -0.6% |
| 98 | Milpitas, CA | 40,260 | +4% |
| 99 | Citrus Heights, CA | 39,725 | -1.2% |
| 100 | Tracy, CA | 39,276 | +2% |
| 101 | Alameda, CA | 38,919 | -0.6% |
| 102 | Redding, CA | 37,884 | +3.1% |
| 103 | Chino, CA | 37,794 | +1.7% |
| 104 | Bellflower, CA | 37,713 | +12.7% |
| 105 | Redondo Beach, CA | 37,652 | -1.6% |
| 106 | Pleasanton, CA | 37,084 | -1.2% |
| 107 | Upland, CA | 36,539 | +1.6% |
| 108 | South San Francisco, CA | 36,413 | +0.3% |
| 109 | Menifee, CA | 36,407 | +7.6% |
| 110 | Indio, CA | 35,922 | +1.5% |
| 111 | Union City, CA | 35,627 | +2.5% |
| 112 | Pittsburg, CA | 34,612 | +12.4% |
| 113 | Hesperia, CA | 34,553 | +9.5% |
| 114 | Folsom, CA | 34,426 | +1.1% |
| 115 | Chino Hills, CA | 33,991 | -13.7% |
| 116 | Rancho Cordova, CA | 33,632 | +7.7% |
| 117 | Baldwin Park, CA | 33,126 | +4.1% |
| 118 | Santa Cruz, CA | 32,851 | +5.1% |
| 119 | Palo Alto, CA | 32,468 | -3.4% |
| 120 | Laguna Niguel, CA | 32,424 | -2.6% |
| 121 | Dublin, CA | 32,114 | +14.9% |
| 122 | Walnut Creek, CA | 32,055 | -0.2% |
| 123 | Redlands, CA | 31,910 | -1.7% |
| 124 | Eastvale, CA | 31,710 | +15.6% |
| 125 | Yorba Linda, CA | 31,671 | -4.2% |
| 126 | Encinitas, CA | 31,509 | +0.4% |
| 127 | La Habra, CA | 31,500 | +8.4% |
| 128 | Davis, CA | 31,472 | -4.3% |
| 129 | Manteca, CA | 31,360 | -2.3% |
| 130 | Camarillo, CA | 31,121 | -3.2% |
| 131 | Merced, CA | 31,020 | +1.1% |
| 132 | San Rafael, CA | 31,003 | -0.5% |
| 133 | Perris, CA | 30,979 | +16.8% |
| 134 | Gardena, CA | 30,387 | +9.4% |
| 135 | San Clemente, CA | 30,142 | -0.5% |
| 136 | Turlock, CA | 30,070 | -2.7% |
| 137 | La Mesa, CA | 30,055 | +4.1% |
| 138 | Petaluma, CA | 29,688 | -5.9% |
| 139 | Lake Elsinore, CA | 29,679 | +16.6% |
| 140 | Montebello, CA | 29,635 | +11% |
| 141 | Hemet, CA | 29,625 | +13.6% |
| 142 | Pico Rivera, CA | 29,360 | +4.8% |
| 143 | Rocklin, CA | 28,990 | +1.7% |
| 144 | Cupertino, CA | 28,513 | +2.1% |
| 145 | Lynwood, CA | 28,303 | +8.1% |
| 146 | Yuba City, CA | 28,092 | +1.2% |
| 147 | Monterey Park, CA | 28,067 | +2.9% |
| 148 | Aliso Viejo, CA | 28,016 | +0.6% |
| 149 | Woodland, CA | 27,452 | +0.9% |
| 150 | Diamond Bar, CA | 26,858 | -4.5% |
| 151 | Santee, CA | 26,793 | -2.2% |
| 152 | Lodi, CA | 26,785 | +1.9% |
| 153 | Brentwood, CA | 26,750 | +4.5% |
| 154 | Gilroy, CA | 26,749 | +4.5% |
| 155 | Rancho Santa Margarita, CA | 26,619 | -0.3% |
| 156 | Fountain Valley, CA | 26,582 | -2.1% |
| 157 | Covina, CA | 26,182 | +18% |
| 158 | National City, CA | 26,005 | +13.7% |
| 159 | West Sacramento, CA | 25,639 | +9.5% |
| 160 | Placentia, CA | 25,545 | +3.6% |
| 161 | Tulare, CA | 25,447 | +2.1% |
| 162 | Paramount, CA | 25,295 | +11.5% |
| 163 | Madera, CA | 25,287 | +6.8% |
| 164 | Porterville, CA | 25,026 | +20.6% |
| 165 | Novato, CA | 24,938 | -11.4% |
| 166 | Arcadia, CA | 24,905 | -8.8% |
| 167 | Huntington Park, CA | 24,842 | +1% |
| 168 | Azusa, CA | 24,654 | +8% |
| 169 | Apple Valley, CA | 24,563 | -5% |
| 170 | San Luis Obispo, CA | 24,498 | +1.3% |
| 171 | Glendora, CA | 24,031 | +1% |
| 172 | San Bruno, CA | 23,914 | -4.4% |
| 173 | Newark, CA | 23,888 | +6.7% |
| 174 | Rosemead, CA | 23,645 | +1.9% |
| 175 | Cypress, CA | 23,634 | -0.3% |
| 176 | West Hollywood, CA | 23,614 | -2.2% |
| 177 | Rohnert Park, CA | 23,557 | +7.4% |
| 178 | La Mirada, CA | 23,273 | +3.6% |
| 179 | Colton, CA | 22,926 | +2.6% |
| 180 | Highland, CA | 22,751 | +2.3% |
| 181 | Poway, CA | 22,592 | -7.4% |
| 182 | Watsonville, CA | 22,454 | -2% |
| 183 | Campbell, CA | 22,403 | -7.4% |
| 184 | Cerritos, CA | 22,304 | -3% |
| 185 | Brea, CA | 22,174 | +5.7% |
| 186 | Cathedral City, CA | 22,017 | -6.4% |
| 187 | Yucaipa, CA | 21,596 | -5.7% |
| 188 | Culver City, CA | 21,203 | -0.1% |
| 189 | Hanford, CA | 21,072 | -5.4% |
| 190 | Pacifica, CA | 20,576 | -9.4% |
| 191 | Morgan Hill, CA | 20,302 | -5.7% |
| 192 | Danville, CA | 20,243 | +3.8% |
| 193 | Oakley, CA | 20,188 | +14.6% |
| 194 | San Gabriel, CA | 19,436 | -1.4% |
| 195 | San Jacinto, CA | 19,172 | +16.9% |
| 196 | Beaumont, CA | 19,171 | +2.3% |
| 197 | Palm Desert, CA | 19,018 | -13.6% |
| 198 | Martinez, CA | 19,003 | -1.7% |
| 199 | Delano, CA | 18,958 | +13.1% |
| 200 | Ceres, CA | 18,827 | -2% |
| 201 | Lompoc, CA | 18,746 | +12.2% |
| 202 | Monrovia, CA | 18,613 | -4.6% |
| 203 | Lincoln, CA | 18,366 | +5.9% |
| 204 | Stanton, CA | 18,022 | +2.3% |
| 205 | Moorpark, CA | 18,019 | -2.8% |
| 206 | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA | 17,954 | -2% |
| 207 | Coachella, CA | 17,951 | +7.8% |
| 208 | La Puente, CA | 17,932 | +1.8% |
| 209 | Pleasant Hill, CA | 17,783 | +4.2% |
| 210 | Claremont, CA | 17,538 | +12.3% |
| 211 | Palm Springs, CA | 17,522 | -14.7% |
| 212 | Goleta, CA | 17,502 | +5.7% |
| 213 | Hollister, CA | 17,432 | +1.1% |
| 214 | San Juan Capistrano, CA | 17,301 | +5.2% |
| 215 | Dana Point, CA | 16,981 | -5.2% |
| 216 | Temple City, CA | 16,850 | -0% |
| 217 | Lawndale, CA | 16,815 | +9% |
| 218 | Bell Gardens, CA | 16,762 | +0.4% |
| 219 | San Dimas, CA | 16,749 | +0.6% |
| 220 | Foster City, CA | 16,690 | -8.3% |
| 221 | Burlingame, CA | 16,535 | -2.7% |
| 222 | Menlo Park, CA | 16,409 | -8.2% |
| 223 | Seaside, CA | 16,271 | -2.8% |
| 224 | Manhattan Beach, CA | 16,199 | -11.5% |
| 225 | El Centro, CA | 16,146 | +1.6% |
| 226 | San Carlos, CA | 16,104 | -0.8% |
| 227 | East Palo Alto, CA | 15,989 | +15.1% |
| 228 | Laguna Hills, CA | 15,755 | -4.2% |
| 229 | Los Banos, CA | 15,554 | +11.9% |
| 230 | Beverly Hills, CA | 15,511 | -9.2% |
| 231 | Los Gatos, CA | 15,161 | +0.6% |
| 232 | Montclair, CA | 14,985 | -13.3% |
| 233 | Atascadero, CA | 14,715 | +2% |
| 234 | Belmont, CA | 14,635 | -5.8% |
| 235 | Monterey, CA | 14,597 | +0.6% |
| 236 | South Pasadena, CA | 14,580 | +4.8% |
| 237 | San Pablo, CA | 14,365 | +12.9% |
| 238 | Wildomar, CA | 14,231 | -7.8% |
| 239 | Bell, CA | 14,198 | +2.2% |
| 240 | La Quinta, CA | 14,170 | -16.4% |
| 241 | La Verne, CA | 14,004 | -5.5% |
| 242 | Suisun City, CA | 13,993 | +3.9% |
| 243 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA | 13,977 | -8.1% |
| 244 | Santa Paula, CA | 13,916 | +7.6% |
| 245 | Saratoga, CA | 13,584 | -3% |
| 246 | Windsor, CA | 13,555 | +1.4% |
| 247 | El Cerrito, CA | 13,515 | |
| 248 | Los Altos, CA | 13,476 | -3% |
| 249 | Desert Hot Springs, CA | 13,419 | +31.5% |
| 250 | Benicia, CA | 13,037 | -7.4% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Residents who did any work for pay or profit in the reference week, or were temporarily absent from a job, annual average.
More on how it is measured
- People aged 16 and over by place of residence, from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Active-duty military personnel and people living in institutions are excluded.
United States cities only for now. Counts people where they live, whatever the place of work, and someone with two jobs counts once. BLS estimates cities by splitting county estimates with Census Bureau employment and population data and unemployment insurance claims, so city figures are less precise than state ones. BLS publishes cities of 25,000 or more, and smaller cities in New England.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 6 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2016 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026). Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average (Cities in California by employed residents, 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19
MLA 9
Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average, Cities in California by employed residents, 2016. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 30 Sept. 2026, https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/california-cities?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2026. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. Cities in California by employed residents, 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/california-cities?period=2016.
Harvard
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2026) Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average, Cities in California by employed residents, 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/california-cities?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{bureau_cities_in_california_by_2016,
author = {{U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics}},
title = {{Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average: Cities in California by employed residents, 2016}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/california-cities?period=2016. Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
TI - Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average: Cities in California by employed residents, 2016
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
DB - Invokely
UR - https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/california-cities?period=2016
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/california-cities?period=2016.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU15-19. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by employed residents using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"employed_residents","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=employed_residents&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10Questions
Which city has the highest employed residents?
Los Angeles, CA, with 1.88 million in 2016, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Which city has the lowest employed residents?
Corcoran, CA, with 5,040 in 2016.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 6 cities have no value for 2016 and are not ranked.