Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate
Haywood County had the highest diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate of 95 counties in 2022, at 20.3%. Williamson County had the lowest, at 10.5%. The median was 15.3%. Source: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Map of counties, 2022
- Under 13
- 13 to 15
- 15 to 16
- 16 to 17
- 17 and over
Top 40 counties, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haywood County | 20.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 2 | Hancock County | 19.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 3 | Pickett County | 18.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 4 | Clay County | 18.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 4 | Cumberland County | 18.1 | +1.4 pts |
| 6 | Decatur County | 17.5 | +1.5 pts |
| 6 | Grainger County | 17.5 | +2.3 pts |
| 8 | Henry County | 17.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 9 | Cocke County | 17.2 | +1 pts |
| 10 | Fentress County | 17.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 10 | Hardeman County | 17.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 10 | Lake County | 17.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 10 | Lauderdale County | 17.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 14 | Jackson County | 17 | +1.5 pts |
| 14 | Van Buren County | 17 | +0.1 pts |
| 16 | Benton County | 16.9 | +0.7 pts |
| 16 | Bledsoe County | 16.9 | +2.1 pts |
| 16 | Johnson County | 16.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 19 | Carter County | 16.6 | +1.2 pts |
| 20 | Rhea County | 16.5 | +2.4 pts |
| 20 | Sequatchie County | 16.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 22 | DeKalb County | 16.4 | +1.8 pts |
| 22 | Lewis County | 16.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 24 | McNairy County | 16.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 24 | Unicoi County | 16.3 | +1 pts |
| 26 | Fayette County | 16.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 26 | Monroe County | 16.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 28 | Crockett County | 16.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 28 | Humphreys County | 16.1 | +2.5 pts |
| 30 | Henderson County | 16 | +1.2 pts |
| 30 | Perry County | 16 | +0.4 pts |
| 30 | Shelby County | 16 | +0.9 pts |
| 33 | Obion County | 15.9 | +0.5 pts |
| 33 | Scott County | 15.9 | +0.7 pts |
| 33 | Warren County | 15.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 36 | Carroll County | 15.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 36 | Greene County | 15.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 36 | Grundy County | 15.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 36 | Loudon County | 15.8 | +1.8 pts |
| 36 | Morgan County | 15.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 36 | Polk County | 15.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 42 | Hardin County | 15.7 | +0.1 pts |
| 43 | Campbell County | 15.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 43 | Gibson County | 15.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 43 | Wayne County | 15.6 | +1 pts |
| 43 | White County | 15.6 | +1 pts |
| 47 | Giles County | 15.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 48 | Lawrence County | 15.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 49 | Madison County | 15.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 49 | Sullivan County | 15.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 51 | Dyer County | 15.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 51 | Franklin County | 15.1 | +1.5 pts |
| 51 | Marion County | 15.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 51 | Overton County | 15.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 51 | Roane County | 15.1 | +1.2 pts |
| 56 | Coffee County | 15 | +1.9 pts |
| 57 | Claiborne County | 14.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 57 | Lincoln County | 14.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 57 | Marshall County | 14.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 57 | Meigs County | 14.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 57 | Union County | 14.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 62 | Hawkins County | 14.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 62 | Moore County | 14.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 62 | Stewart County | 14.7 | +1.2 pts |
| 65 | Chester County | 14.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 65 | Hickman County | 14.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 67 | Houston County | 14.5 | +0.7 pts |
| 68 | Hamblen County | 14.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 69 | Anderson County | 14.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 69 | Cannon County | 14.3 | +0.8 pts |
| 69 | McMinn County | 14.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 72 | Macon County | 14.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 73 | Jefferson County | 14.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 74 | Tipton County | 13.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 75 | Washington County | 13.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 76 | Bedford County | 13.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 76 | Blount County | 13.6 | +0.6 pts |
| 78 | Sevier County | 13.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 79 | Bradley County | 13.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 79 | Hamilton County | 13.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 79 | Smith County | 13.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 82 | Dickson County | 13.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 83 | Cheatham County | 12.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 83 | Weakley County | 12.9 | -0.5 pts |
| 85 | Robertson County | 12.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 86 | Maury County | 12.5 | +0.7 pts |
| 87 | Knox County | 12.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 87 | Wilson County | 12.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 89 | Sumner County | 12.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 89 | Trousdale County | 12.1 | +1.4 pts |
| 91 | Davidson County | 12 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Putnam County | 11.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 93 | Rutherford County | 11.8 | +1.7 pts |
| 94 | Montgomery County | 11.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 95 | Williamson County | 10.5 | +1.5 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Percentage of adults who report being told by a doctor or other health professional that they have diabetes, other than diabetes only during pregnancy. Model-based estimate for adults aged 18 and over from CDC PLACES. Crude prevalence, not age-adjusted.
US counties and cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). CDC PLACES combines Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) answers with local population data through multilevel regression and poststratification, so a county or city value is a model estimate, not a survey count. The year is the BRFSS survey year, not the release year. CDC says the method does not support tracking change in a place over time, and each annual release can change the model, so values for different years are not strictly comparable. A state is missing in a year when its BRFSS data did not meet standards (Kentucky and Pennsylvania in 2023, Florida in 2021). Connecticut counties appear as its nine planning regions from 2022; its eight former counties are not served. City values for 2021 come from the 2023 release, built on 2010 Census place boundaries; later years use 2020 boundaries.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.
Citation styles
APA 7
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence (Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.cdc.gov/places/
MLA 9
PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence, Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4 Dec. 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/tennessee-counties?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2025. PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/tennessee-counties?period=2022.
Harvard
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025) PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence, Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/places/, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/tennessee-counties?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{centers_counties_in_tennessee_by_2022,
author = {{Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}},
title = {{PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence: Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022}},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.cdc.gov/places/},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/tennessee-counties?period=2022. Publisher attribution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
TI - PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence: Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/12/04
PB - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.cdc.gov/places/
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/tennessee-counties?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/tennessee-counties?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Tennessee by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"adult_diabetes_rate_modelled","level":"province","within":"Tennessee","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=adult_diabetes_rate_modelled&level=province&within=Tennessee&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate?
Haywood County, with 20.3% in 2022, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Which county has the lowest diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate?
Williamson County, with 10.5% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate: other rankings
- Counties in New Jersey
- Counties in Mississippi
- Counties in Michigan
- Cities in Delaware
- Cities in California
- Cities in Oklahoma