Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate
Pushmataha County had the highest diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate of 77 counties in 2022, at 18.6%. Payne County had the lowest, at 10%. The median was 14.6%. Source: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Map of counties, 2022
- Under 13
- 13 to 14
- 14 to 15
- 15 to 16
- 16 to 17
- 17 and over
Top 40 counties, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pushmataha County | 18.6 | +1.9 pts |
| 2 | McIntosh County | 17.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 3 | Adair County | 17.6 | -0.3 pts |
| 4 | Craig County | 17.4 | +1.8 pts |
| 5 | Delaware County | 17.3 | +0.8 pts |
| 6 | Coal County | 17.2 | +0.8 pts |
| 6 | Kiowa County | 17.2 | +1.4 pts |
| 6 | Latimer County | 17.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 6 | Okfuskee County | 17.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 10 | Choctaw County | 17.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 10 | Harmon County | 17.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 12 | Tillman County | 17 | +1.3 pts |
| 13 | McCurtain County | 16.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 14 | Sequoyah County | 16.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 15 | Jefferson County | 16.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 16 | Haskell County | 16.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 17 | Marshall County | 16.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 17 | Okmulgee County | 16.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 19 | Cotton County | 16.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 19 | Hughes County | 16.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 19 | Ottawa County | 16.1 | +0.7 pts |
| 22 | Seminole County | 16 | +0.2 pts |
| 23 | Le Flore County | 15.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 24 | Grant County | 15.6 | +2.3 pts |
| 25 | Atoka County | 15.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 25 | Blaine County | 15.5 | +1 pts |
| 25 | Johnston County | 15.5 | +0.7 pts |
| 25 | Mayes County | 15.5 | +1 pts |
| 25 | Osage County | 15.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 30 | Cherokee County | 15.4 | +1 pts |
| 30 | Nowata County | 15.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 32 | Caddo County | 15.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 32 | Roger Mills County | 15.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 34 | Pittsburg County | 15 | +0.6 pts |
| 35 | Murray County | 14.9 | +1 pts |
| 36 | Harper County | 14.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 36 | Washington County | 14.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 38 | Ellis County | 14.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 39 | Muskogee County | 14.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 40 | Love County | 14.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 40 | Texas County | 14.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 42 | Dewey County | 14.4 | +1 pts |
| 42 | Garvin County | 14.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 42 | Lincoln County | 14.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 45 | Stephens County | 14.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 46 | Bryan County | 14.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 46 | Creek County | 14.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 46 | Noble County | 14.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 46 | Pawnee County | 14.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 46 | Pontotoc County | 14.1 | +1.7 pts |
| 51 | Greer County | 14 | +0.9 pts |
| 51 | Kay County | 14 | +0.1 pts |
| 51 | Washita County | 14 | +1.2 pts |
| 54 | Cimarron County | 13.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 55 | Carter County | 13.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 55 | Pottawatomie County | 13.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 57 | Major County | 13.7 | +0.9 pts |
| 58 | Beaver County | 13.6 | +0.8 pts |
| 58 | Jackson County | 13.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 60 | Alfalfa County | 13.3 | +0.8 pts |
| 60 | Woodward County | 13.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 62 | Grady County | 12.9 | +1 pts |
| 62 | Logan County | 12.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 64 | Beckham County | 12.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 65 | Garfield County | 12.7 | +0.8 pts |
| 65 | Kingfisher County | 12.7 | +1 pts |
| 67 | Comanche County | 12.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 67 | McClain County | 12.5 | +1.4 pts |
| 67 | Oklahoma County | 12.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 67 | Tulsa County | 12.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 71 | Rogers County | 12.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 72 | Wagoner County | 12.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 73 | Custer County | 11.7 | 0 pts |
| 74 | Canadian County | 11.5 | +1.8 pts |
| 75 | Cleveland County | 11.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 76 | Woods County | 11.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 77 | Payne County | 10 | +0.6 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Percentage of adults who report being told by a doctor or other health professional that they have diabetes, other than diabetes only during pregnancy. Model-based estimate for adults aged 18 and over from CDC PLACES. Crude prevalence, not age-adjusted.
US counties and cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). CDC PLACES combines Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) answers with local population data through multilevel regression and poststratification, so a county or city value is a model estimate, not a survey count. The year is the BRFSS survey year, not the release year. CDC says the method does not support tracking change in a place over time, and each annual release can change the model, so values for different years are not strictly comparable. A state is missing in a year when its BRFSS data did not meet standards (Kentucky and Pennsylvania in 2023, Florida in 2021). Connecticut counties appear as its nine planning regions from 2022; its eight former counties are not served. City values for 2021 come from the 2023 release, built on 2010 Census place boundaries; later years use 2020 boundaries.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.
Citation styles
APA 7
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence (Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.cdc.gov/places/
MLA 9
PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence, Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4 Dec. 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/oklahoma-counties?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2025. PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/oklahoma-counties?period=2022.
Harvard
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025) PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence, Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/places/, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/oklahoma-counties?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{centers_counties_in_oklahoma_by_2022,
author = {{Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}},
title = {{PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence: Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022}},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.cdc.gov/places/},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/oklahoma-counties?period=2022. Publisher attribution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
TI - PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence: Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate, 2022
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/12/04
PB - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.cdc.gov/places/
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/oklahoma-counties?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/adult-diabetes-rate-county-estimate/oklahoma-counties?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/places/. Retrieved 2026-10-12. These data are available free from CDC. Use does not imply endorsement by CDC, ATSDR, HHS or the United States Government.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Oklahoma by diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"adult_diabetes_rate_modelled","level":"province","within":"Oklahoma","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=adult_diabetes_rate_modelled&level=province&within=Oklahoma&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate?
Pushmataha County, with 18.6% in 2022, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Which county has the lowest diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate?
Payne County, with 10% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, County Data (swc5-untb, fu4u-a9bh, h3ej-a9ec and later releases), diagnosed diabetes in adults, crude prevalence. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Diagnosed diabetes in adults, local model estimate: other rankings
- Counties in Utah
- Counties in Indiana
- Counties in Iowa
- Cities in Oklahoma
- Cities in Arizona
- Cities in Virginia