# NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over, 2025

All 73 values come from Eurostat, European Commission for 2025, so the places are comparable.

- Indicator id: `population_65_plus_share`
- Unit: %
- Definition: Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.
- Source: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3) (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table)
- Retrieved: 2026-10-08
- Citation: Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
- Web page: https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-65-plus/poland-provinces
- CSV: https://invokely.ai/download/rankings/population-65-plus/poland-provinces.csv

| Rank | Place | % |
|---:|---|---:|
| 1 | Miasto Łódź | 26 |
| 2 | Wałbrzyski | 25.4 |
| 3 | Sosnowiecki | 25.2 |
| 4 | Jeleniogórski | 24.1 |
| 5 | Częstochowski | 24 |
| 5 | Kielecki | 24 |
| 7 | Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski | 23.9 |
| 8 | Chełmsko-zamojski | 23.8 |
| 9 | Miasto Szczecin | 23.5 |
| 10 | Nyski | 23.2 |
| 11 | Koszaliński | 23 |
| 11 | Szczecinecko-pyrzycki | 23 |
| 13 | Puławski | 22.9 |
| 14 | Łomżyński | 22.7 |
| 14 | Skierniewicki | 22.7 |
| 16 | Katowicki | 22.6 |
| 17 | Legnicko-głogowski | 22.5 |
| 18 | Gliwicki | 22.4 |
| 18 | Trójmiejski | 22.4 |
| 18 | Włocławski | 22.4 |
| 21 | Piotrkowski | 22.1 |
| 22 | Łódzki | 21.9 |
| 22 | Sieradzki | 21.9 |
| 24 | Opolski | 21.8 |
| 24 | Oświęcimski | 21.8 |
| 26 | Bydgosko-toruński | 21.7 |
| 26 | Krośnieński | 21.7 |
| 26 | Radomski | 21.7 |
| 26 | Zielonogórski | 21.7 |
| 30 | Bytomski | 21.6 |
| 30 | Miasto Poznań | 21.6 |
| 32 | Bialski | 21.5 |
| 32 | Płocki | 21.5 |
| 34 | Przemyski | 21.4 |
| 35 | Inowrocławski | 21.3 |
| 35 | Olsztyński | 21.3 |
| 35 | Szczeciński | 21.3 |
| 38 | Elbląski | 21.2 |
| 38 | Lubelski | 21.2 |
| 38 | Tarnobrzeski | 21.2 |
| 41 | Bielski | 21.1 |
| 41 | Gorzowski | 21.1 |
| 41 | Słupski | 21.1 |
| 44 | Rybnicki | 20.9 |
| 45 | Ełcki | 20.8 |
| 45 | Suwalski | 20.8 |
| 47 | Białostocki | 20.7 |
| 48 | Miasto Wrocław | 20.6 |
| 48 | Żyrardowski | 20.6 |
| 50 | Ciechanowski | 20.5 |
| 50 | Grudziądzki | 20.5 |
| 52 | Koniński | 20.4 |
| 52 | Świecki | 20.4 |
| 54 | Kaliski | 20.3 |
| 54 | Pilski | 20.3 |
| 56 | Siedlecki | 20.2 |
| 56 | Tarnowski | 20.2 |
| 58 | Miasto Kraków | 19.9 |
| 59 | Miasto Warszawa | 19.8 |
| 59 | Ostrołęcki | 19.8 |
| 61 | Tyski | 19.7 |
| 62 | Starogardzki | 19.4 |
| 63 | Chojnicki | 18.9 |
| 64 | Leszczyński | 18.8 |
| 65 | Rzeszowski | 18.6 |
| 66 | Nowotarski | 18.5 |
| 67 | Wrocławski | 18.1 |
| 68 | Krakowski | 17.7 |
| 69 | Warszawski zachodni | 17.5 |
| 70 | Nowosądecki | 17.4 |
| 71 | Warszawski wschodni | 17 |
| 72 | Poznański | 16.1 |
| 73 | Gdański | 15.1 |